Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

2,325 questions in 216 reviews · Airways

current versions
No studies 249 · 10.7%Ungraded 107 · 4.6%Very low 276 · 11.9%Low 751 · 32.3%Moderate 718 · 30.9%High 224 · 9.6%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Intervention NR
Total studies: 8 RCTs Total Participants: 9983 · Adolescents and adults with symptomatic asthma Interventions: HD‐ICS/LABA, MD‐TRIPLE, HD‐TRIPLE Comparator…
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted8 studies · 9983 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Severe exacerbations ‐ MD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 812(1 RCT)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.4 [0.45, 4.37]1 study · 812 participantsLow
Intervention NR
ACQ responders at 6 months ‐ MD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 3063(3 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.09 [0.99, 1.19]3 studies · 6 participantsLow
Intervention NR
ACQ responders at 6 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 1916(2 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.11 [0.91, 1.35]2 studies · 6 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
ACQ responders at 6 months ‐ MD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2480(2 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.97, 1.08]2 studies · 6 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
ACQ responders at 6 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 4818(4 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.07 [1.01, 1.14]4 studies · 6 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
ACQ responders at 6 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD TRIPLE№ of participants: 2821(3 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.99 [0.95, 1.03]3 studies · 6 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
ACQ responders at 6 months ‐ TRIPLE vs DUAL№ of participants: 7881(5 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.09 [1.02, 1.15]5 studies · 6 participantsLow
Intervention NR
ACQ responders at 12 months ‐ HD‐ICS/LABA vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2817(2 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.99 [0.9, 1.07]2 studies · 12 participantsLow
Intervention NR
ACQ responders at 12 months ‐ MD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2222(2 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.01 [0.95, 1.07]2 studies · 12 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
ACQ responders at 12 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 1088(1 RCT)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.08 [1.01, 1.15]1 study · 12 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
ACQ responders at 12 months ‐ MD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 1631(1 RCT)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.97 [0.91, 1.03]1 study · 12 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Severe exacerbations ‐ HD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 1727(2 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.8 [0.45, 1.42]2 studies · 1727 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
ACQ responders at 12 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 3982(3 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.11 [0.99, 1.23]3 studies · 12 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
ACQ responders at 12 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD TRIPLE№ of participants: 1089(1 RCT)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.08 [1.01, 1.16]1 study · 12 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
ACQ responders at 12 months ‐ TRIPLE vs DUAL№ of participants: 6204(4 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.07 [0.99, 1.17]4 studies · 12 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Total studies: 13 RCTs Total Participants: 144476 · Adolescents and adults with symptomatic asthma Interventions: HD‐ICS/LABA, MD‐TRIPLE, HD‐TRIPLE Comparator…
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted13 studies · 144476 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
HD‐ICS/LABA (Direct evidence; 8 RCTs; 7511 participants) · Adolescents and adults with symptomatic asthma Interventions: HD‐ICS/LABA, MD‐TRIPLE, HD‐TRIPLE Comparator…
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted8 studies · 7511 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
MD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 3 RCTs; 3187 participants) · Adolescents and adults with symptomatic asthma Interventions: HD‐ICS/LABA, MD‐TRIPLE, HD‐TRIPLE Comparator…
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 3187 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
HD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 2 RCT; 2039 participants) · Adolescents and adults with symptomatic asthma Interventions: HD‐ICS/LABA, MD‐TRIPLE, HD‐TRIPLE Comparator…
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 2039 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
MD‐ICS/LABA · Adolescents and adults with symptomatic asthma Interventions: HD‐ICS/LABA, MD‐TRIPLE, HD‐TRIPLE Comparator…
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Outcome№ of participants(studies)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
All cause SAEs ‐ HD‐ICS/LABA vs MD‐ICS LABA№ of participants: 7511(8 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.03 [0.83, 1.29]8 studies · 7511 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Severe exacerbations ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD TRIPLE№ of participants: 814(1 RCT)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.57 [0.17, 1.93]1 study · 814 participantsLow
Intervention NR
All cause SAEs ‐ MD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 3187(3 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.13 [0.85, 1.5]3 studies · 3187 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
All cause SAEs ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2039(2 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.05 [0.76, 1.47]2 studies · 2039 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
All cause SAEs ‐ MD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2660(2 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.08 [0.81, 1.44]2 studies · 2660 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
All cause SAEs ‐ HD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 5004(4 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.95 [0.77, 1.18]4 studies · 5004 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
All cause SAEs ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD TRIPLE№ of participants: 2998(3 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.96 [0.72, 1.27]3 studies · 2998 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
All cause SAEs ‐ TRIPLE vs DUAL№ of participants: 8192(6 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.03 [0.87, 1.21]6 studies · 8192 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Asthma‐related SAEs ‐ HD‐ICS/LABA vs MD‐ICS LABA№ of participants: 6244(6 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.33 [0.8, 2.21]6 studies · 6244 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Asthma‐related SAEs ‐ MD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 3188(3 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.52 [0.85, 2.69]3 studies · 3188 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Asthma‐related SAEs ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2039(2 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.86 [0.41, 1.8]2 studies · 2039 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Asthma‐related SAEs ‐ MD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2660(2 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.35 [0.77, 2.36]2 studies · 2660 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Severe exacerbations ‐ TRIPLE vs DUAL№ of participants: 2540(2 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.84 [0.51, 1.4]2 studies · 2540 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Asthma‐related SAEs ‐ HD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 5004(4 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.86 [0.58, 1.27]4 studies · 5004 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Asthma‐related SAEs ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD TRIPLE№ of participants: 3472(3 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.57 [0.31, 1.05]3 studies · 3472 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Asthma‐related SAEs ‐ TRIPLE vs DUAL№ of participants: 8192(6 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.04 [0.76, 1.42]6 studies · 8192 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
All cause AEs ‐ HD‐ICS/LABA vs MD‐ICS LABA№ of participants: 5949(7 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.01 [0.97, 1.06]7 studies · 5949 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
All cause AEs ‐ MD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 3188(3 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.96 [0.91, 1]3 studies · 3188 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
All cause AEs ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2039(2 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.92 [0.85, 1]2 studies · 2039 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
All cause AEs ‐ MD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2659(2 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.99 [0.83, 1.18]2 studies · 2659 participantsLow
Intervention NR
All cause AEs ‐ HD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 5004(4 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.91 [0.87, 0.96]4 studies · 5004 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
All cause AEs ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD TRIPLE№ of participants: 3473(3 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.95 [0.9, 1.02]3 studies · 3473 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
All cause AEs ‐ TRIPLE vs DUAL№ of participants: 8192(6 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.93 [0.9, 0.96]6 studies · 8192 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Moderate to severe exacerbations ‐ HD‐ICS/LABA vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 5452(6 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.93 [0.82, 1.05]6 studies · 5452 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Dropouts due to adverse event ‐ HD‐ICS/LABA vs MD‐ICS LABA№ of participants: 5969(7 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.68, 1.48]7 studies · 5969 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Dropouts due to adverse event ‐ MD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 3205(3 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.42 [0.08, 2.14]3 studies · 3205 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Dropouts due to adverse event ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2670(2 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.47 [0.19, 1.18]2 studies · 2670 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Dropouts due to adverse event ‐ MD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2668(2 RCTs)
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.24 [0.76, 2.02]2 studies · 2668 participantsModerate