Cochrane · systematic review · CD013799

Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and varying doses of inhaled corticosteroids in adolescents and adults with asthma: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis

Oba, Y, Anwer, S, Maduke, T, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2022 · Cochrane Library

AirwaysAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
161
current version
GRADE rated
128
No studies
15
Included studies
NR
No studies 15 · 9.3%Ungraded 18 · 11.2%Very low 4 · 2.5%Low 26 · 16.1%Moderate 74 · 46%High 24 · 14.9%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

NMA Summary of Findings for severe exacerbations (asthma‐related hospitalisations)

Population: Adolescents and adults with symptomatic asthma Interventions: HD‐ICS/LABA, MD‐TRIPLE, HD‐TRIPLE Comparator (reference): Medium‐Dose ICS/LABA (MD‐ICS/LABA) Outcome: Severe exacerbations Setting(s): Outpatient
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Total studies: 8 RCTs Total Participants: 9983
no estimate extracted8 studies · 9983 participantsUngraded
HD‐ICS/LABA (Direct evidence; 7 RCTs; 7023 participants)
no estimate extracted7 studies · 7023 participantsModerate
MD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 2 RCTs; 1023 participants)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 1023 participantsLow
HD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 2 RCTs; 1024 participants)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 1024 participantsLow
MD‐ICS/LABA
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Asthma exacerbations ‐ pairwise comparisons

15 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome№ of participants(studies)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Severe exacerbations ‐ HD‐ICA/LABA vs MD‐ICS LABA№ of participants: 4492(5 RCTs)
RR 1.49 [0.74, 3.01]5 studies · 4492 participantsModerate
Severe exacerbations ‐ MD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 813(1 RCT)
RR 1 [0.35, 2.83]1 study · 813 participantsLow
Severe exacerbations ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 815(1 RCT)
RR 0.57 [0.17, 1.93]1 study · 815 participantsLow
Severe exacerbations ‐ MD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 812(1 RCT)
RR 1.4 [0.45, 4.37]1 study · 812 participantsLow
Severe exacerbations ‐ HD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 1727(2 RCTs)
RR 0.8 [0.45, 1.42]2 studies · 1727 participantsModerate
Severe exacerbations ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD TRIPLE№ of participants: 814(1 RCT)
RR 0.57 [0.17, 1.93]1 study · 814 participantsLow
Severe exacerbations ‐ TRIPLE vs DUAL№ of participants: 2540(2 RCTs)
RR 0.84 [0.51, 1.4]2 studies · 2540 participantsModerate
Moderate to severe exacerbations ‐ HD‐ICS/LABA vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 5452(6 RCTs)
RR 0.93 [0.82, 1.05]6 studies · 5452 participantsHigh
Moderate to severe exacerbations ‐ MD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 3184(3 RCTs)
RR 0.86 [0.75, 0.99]3 studies · 3184 participantsModerate
Moderate to severe exacerbations ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2037(2 RCTs)
RR 0.78 [0.66, 0.92]2 studies · 2037 participantsHigh
Moderate to severe exacerbations ‐ MD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2651(2 RCTs)
RR 1.05 [0.78, 1.41]2 studies · 2651 participantsLow
Moderate to severe exacerbations ‐ HD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 4989(4 RCTs)
RR 0.83 [0.75, 0.92]4 studies · 4989 participantsHigh
Moderate to severe exacerbations ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD TRIPLE№ of participants: 3470(3 RCTs)
RR 0.85 [0.72, 1.01]3 studies · 3470 participantsModerate
Moderate to severe exacerbations ‐ TRIPLE vs DUAL№ of participants: 8173(5 RCTs)
RR 0.85 [0.78, 0.92]5 studies · 8173 participantsHigh

NMA Summary of Findings for moderate to severe (steroid‐requiring) exacerbations

Population: Adolescents and adults with symptomatic asthma Interventions: HD‐ICS/LABA, MD‐TRIPLE, HD‐TRIPLE Comparator (reference): Medium‐Dose ICS/LABA (MD‐ICS/LABA) Outcome: Moderate to severe exacerbations Setting(s): Outpatient
8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Total studies: 10 RCTs Total Participants: 12407
no estimate extracted10 studies · 12407 participantsUngraded
HD‐ICS/LABA (Direct evidence; 6 RCTs; 5452 participants)
no estimate extracted6 studies · 5452 participantsHigh
MD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 3 RCTs; 3184 participants)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 3184 participantsModerate
HD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 2 RCTs; 2037 participants)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 2037 participantsHigh
MD‐ICS/LABA
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
HD Triple vs. MD Triple
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
HD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 3 RCTs; 3470 participants)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 3470 participantsModerate
MD Triple
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

NMA Summary of Findings for change from baseline in ACQ scores at 3 months

Population: Adolescents and adults with symptomatic asthma Interventions: HD‐ICS/LABA, MD‐TRIPLE, HD‐TRIPLE Comparator (reference): Medium‐Dose ICS/LABA (MD‐ICS/LABA) Outcome: Change from baseline in ACQ scores at 3 months Setting(s): Outpatient
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Total studies: 4 RCTs Total Participants: 4529
no estimate extracted4 studies · 4529 participantsUngraded
HD‐ICS/LABA (Direct evidence; 3 RCTs; 2450 participants)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 2450 participantsModerate
MD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 1 RCT; 768 participants)
no estimate extracted1 study · 768 participantsLow
HD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 1 RCT; 764 participants)
no estimate extracted1 study · 764 participantsLow
MD‐ICS/LABA
1NRUngraded

NMA Summary of Findings for change from baseline in ACQ scores at 6 months

Population: Adolescents and adults with symptomatic asthma Interventions: HD‐ICS/LABA, MD‐TRIPLE, HD‐TRIPLE Comparator (reference): Medium‐Dose ICS/LABA (MD‐ICS/LABA) Outcome: Change from baseline in ACQ scores at 6 months Setting(s): Outpatient
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Total studies: 6 RCTs Total Participants: 7957
no estimate extracted6 studies · 7957 participantsUngraded
HD‐ICS/LABA (Direct evidence; 3 RCTs; 3762 participants)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 3762 participantsModerate
MD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 2 RCTs; 1961 participants)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 1961 participantsModerate
HD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 2 RCTs; 1952 participants)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 1952 participantsModerate
MD‐ICS/LABA
1NRUngraded

NMA Summary of Findings for change from baseline in ACQ scores at 12 months

Population: Adolescents and adults with symptomatic asthma Interventions: HD‐ICS/LABA, MD‐TRIPLE, HD‐TRIPLE Comparator (reference): Medium‐Dose ICS/LABA (MD‐ICS/LABA) Outcome: Change from baseline in ACQ scores at 12 months Setting(s): Outpatient
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Total studies: 5 RCTs Total Participants: 5440
no estimate extracted5 studies · 5440 participantsUngraded
HD‐ICS/LABA (Direct evidence; 3 RCTs; 3152 participants)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 3152 participantsModerate
MD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 2 RCTs; 1366 participants)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 1366 participantsModerate
HD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 2 RCTs; 1379 participants)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 1379 participantsModerate
MD‐ICS/LABA
1NRUngraded

Asthma Control Questionnaire: change from baseline ‐ pairwise comparisons ‡

22 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome№ of participants(studies)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
CFB in ACQ at 3 months ‐ HD‐ICS/LABA vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2450(3 RCTs)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 2450 participantsModerate
CFB in ACQ at 3 months ‐ MD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 768(1 RCT)
no estimate extracted1 study · 3 participantsLow
CFB in ACQ at 3 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 764(1 RCT)
no estimate extracted1 study · 3 participantsLow
CFB in ACQ at 3 months ‐ MD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 771(1 RCT)
no estimate extracted1 study · 3 participantsLow
CFB in ACQ at 3 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 767(1 RCT)
no estimate extracted1 study · 3 participantsLow
CFB in ACQ at 3 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD TRIPLE№ of participants: 2079(2 RCTs)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 3 participantsModerate
CFB in ACQ at 3 months ‐ TRIPLE vs DUAL№ of participants: 1535(1 RCT)
no estimate extracted1 study · 3 participantsModerate
CFB in ACQ at 6 months ‐ HD‐ICS/LABA vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 3762(3 RCTs)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 6 participantsModerate
CFB in ACQ at 6 months ‐ MD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 1961(2 RCTs)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 6 participantsModerate
CFB in ACQ at 6 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 1952(2 RCTs)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 6 participantsModerate
CFB in ACQ at 6 months ‐ MD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2561(2 RCTs)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 6 participantsModerate
CFB in ACQ at 6 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 3459(3 RCTs)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 6 participantsLow
CFB in ACQ at 6 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD TRIPLE№ of participants: 3288(3 RCTs)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 6 participantsModerate
CFB in ACQ at 6 months ‐ TRIPLE vs DUAL№ of participants: 5408(4 RCTs)
no estimate extracted4 studies · 6 participantsModerate
CFB in ACQ at 12 months ‐ HD‐ICS/LABA vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 3152(3 RCTs)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 12 participantsLow
CFB in ACQ at 12 months ‐ MD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 1366(2 RCTs)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 12 participantsModerate
CFB in ACQ at 12 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 1379(2 RCTs)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 12 participantsModerate
CFB in ACQ at 12 months ‐ MD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 1967(2 RCTs)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 12 participantsLow
CFB in ACQ at 12 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2887(3 RCTs)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 12 participantsModerate
CFB in ACQ at 12 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD TRIPLE№ of participants: 1381(2 RCTs)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 12 participantsModerate
CFB in ACQ at 12 months ‐ DUAL vs TRIPLE№ of participants: 4253(4 RCTs)
no estimate extracted4 studies · 12 participantsModerate

NMA Summary of Findings for change from baseline in AQLQ scores at 6 months

Population: Adolescents and adults with symptomatic asthma Interventions: HD‐ICS/LABA, MD‐TRIPLE, HD‐TRIPLE Comparator (reference): Medium‐Dose ICS/LABA (MD‐ICS/LABA) Outcome: Change from baseline in AQLQ score at 6 months Setting(s): Outpatient
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Total studies: 4 RCTs Total Participants: 3454
no estimate extracted4 studies · 3454 participantsUngraded
HD‐ICS/LABA (Direct evidence; 1 RCT; 1223 participants)
no estimate extracted1 study · 1223 participantsModerate
MD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 0 RCTs; 0 participants)
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsLow
HD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 0 RCTs; 0 participants)
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsLow
MD‐ICS/LABA
1NRUngraded

NMA Summary of Findings for change from baseline in AQLQ scores at 12 months

Population: Adolescents and adults with symptomatic asthma Interventions: HD‐ICS/LABA, MD‐TRIPLE, HD‐TRIPLE Comparator (reference): Medium‐Dose ICS/LABA (MD‐ICS/LABA) Outcome: Change from baseline in AQLQ score at 12 months Setting(s): Outpatient
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Total studies: 4 RCTs Total Participants: 4809
no estimate extracted4 studies · 4809 participantsUngraded
HD‐ICS/LABA (Direct evidence; 2 RCTs; 2815 participants)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 2815 participantsModerate
MD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 1 RCT; 1071 participants)
no estimate extracted1 study · 1071 participantsModerate
HD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 1 RCT; 1088 participants)
no estimate extracted1 study · 1088 participantsModerate
MD‐ICS/LABA
1NRUngraded

Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change from baseline ‐ pairwise comparisons ‡

12 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome№ of participants(studies)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
CFB in AQLQ at 6 months ‐ HD‐ICS/LABA vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 1223(1 RCT)
no estimate extracted1 study · 6 participantsModerate
CFB in AQLQ at 6 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 907(2 RCTs)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 6 participantsLow
CFB in AQLQ at 6 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD TRIPLE№ of participants: 1426(1 RCT)
no estimate extracted1 study · 6 participantsModerate
CFB in AQLQ at 6 months ‐ TRIPLE vs DUAL№ of participants: 907(2 RCTs)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 6 participantsLow
CFB in AQLQ at 12 months ‐ HD‐ICS/LABA vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2815(2 RCTs)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 12 participantsModerate
CFB in AQLQ at 12 months ‐ MD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 1071(1 RCT)
no estimate extracted1 study · 12 participantsModerate
CFB in AQLQ at 12 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 1088(1 RCT)
no estimate extracted1 study · 12 participantsModerate
CFB in AQLQ at 12 months ‐ MD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 1628(1 RCT)
no estimate extracted1 study · 12 participantsModerate
CFB in AQLQ at 12 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2552(3 RCTs)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 12 participantsModerate
CFB in AQLQ at 12 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD TRIPLE№ of participants: 1087(1 RCT)
no estimate extracted1 study · 12 participantsModerate
CFB in AQLQ at 12 months ‐ TRIPLE vs DUAL№ of participants: 3623(3 RCTs)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 12 participantsModerate

NMA Summary of Findings for ACQ responders at 6 months

Population: Adolescents and adults with symptomatic asthma Interventions: HD‐ICS/LABA, MD‐TRIPLE, HD‐TRIPLE Comparator (reference): Medium‐Dose ICS/LABA (MD‐ICS/LABA) Outcome: ACQ responders at 6 months Setting(s): Outpatient
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Total studies: 7 RCTs Total Participants: 10453
no estimate extracted7 studies · 10453 participantsUngraded
HD‐ICS/LABA (Direct evidence; 3 RCTs; 3700 participants)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 3700 participantsModerate
MD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 3 RCTs; 3063 participants)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 3063 participantsLow
HD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 2 RCTs; 1916 participants)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 1916 participantsLow
MD‐ICS/LABA
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

NMA Summary of Findings for ACQ responders at 12 months

Population: Adolescents and adults with symptomatic asthma Interventions: HD‐ICS/LABA, MD‐TRIPLE, HD‐TRIPLE Comparator (reference): Medium‐Dose ICS/LABA (MD‐ICS/LABA) Outcome: ACQ responders at 12 months
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Total studies: 5 RCTs Total Participants: 7391
no estimate extracted5 studies · 7391 participantsUngraded
HD‐ICS/LABA (Direct evidence; 2 RCTs; 2817 participants)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 2817 participantsModerate
MD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 2 RCTs; 2237 participants)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 2237 participantsModerate
HD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 1 RCT; 1088 participants)
no estimate extracted1 study · 1088 participantsModerate
MD‐ICS/LABA
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Asthma Control Questionnaire responders ‐ pairwise comparisons

15 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome№ of participants(studies)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
ACQ responders at 6 months ‐ HD‐ICS/LABA vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 3700(3 RCTs)
RR 1.02 [0.96, 1.08]3 studies · 6 participantsModerate
ACQ responders at 6 months ‐ MD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 3063(3 RCTs)
RR 1.09 [0.99, 1.19]3 studies · 6 participantsLow
ACQ responders at 6 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 1916(2 RCTs)
RR 1.11 [0.91, 1.35]2 studies · 6 participantsVery low
ACQ responders at 6 months ‐ MD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2480(2 RCTs)
RR 1.02 [0.97, 1.08]2 studies · 6 participantsModerate
ACQ responders at 6 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 4818(4 RCTs)
RR 1.07 [1.01, 1.14]4 studies · 6 participantsModerate
ACQ responders at 6 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD TRIPLE№ of participants: 2821(3 RCTs)
RR 0.99 [0.95, 1.03]3 studies · 6 participantsModerate
ACQ responders at 6 months ‐ TRIPLE vs DUAL№ of participants: 7881(5 RCTs)
RR 1.09 [1.02, 1.15]5 studies · 6 participantsLow
ACQ responders at 12 months ‐ HD‐ICS/LABA vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2817(2 RCTs)
RR 0.99 [0.9, 1.07]2 studies · 12 participantsLow
ACQ responders at 12 months ‐ MD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2222(2 RCTs)
RR 1.01 [0.95, 1.07]2 studies · 12 participantsModerate
ACQ responders at 12 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 1088(1 RCT)
RR 1.08 [1.01, 1.15]1 study · 12 participantsModerate
ACQ responders at 12 months ‐ MD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 1631(1 RCT)
RR 0.97 [0.91, 1.03]1 study · 12 participantsModerate
ACQ responders at 12 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 3982(3 RCTs)
RR 1.11 [0.99, 1.23]3 studies · 12 participantsVery low
ACQ responders at 12 months ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD TRIPLE№ of participants: 1089(1 RCT)
RR 1.08 [1.01, 1.16]1 study · 12 participantsModerate
ACQ responders at 12 months ‐ TRIPLE vs DUAL№ of participants: 6204(4 RCTs)
RR 1.07 [0.99, 1.17]4 studies · 12 participantsVery low

NMA Summary of Findings for all‐cause SAEs

Population: Adolescents and adults with symptomatic asthma Interventions: HD‐ICS/LABA, MD‐TRIPLE, HD‐TRIPLE Comparator (reference): Medium‐Dose ICS/LABA (MD‐ICS/LABA) Outcome: All‐cause serious adverse events (SAEs) Setting(s): Outpatient
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Total studies: 13 RCTs Total Participants: 144476
no estimate extracted13 studies · 144476 participantsUngraded
HD‐ICS/LABA (Direct evidence; 8 RCTs; 7511 participants)
no estimate extracted8 studies · 7511 participantsHigh
MD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 3 RCTs; 3187 participants)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 3187 participantsModerate
HD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 2 RCT; 2039 participants)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 2039 participantsModerate
MD‐ICS/LABA
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Serious adverse events, adverse events, and dropouts due to adverse event ‐ pairwise comparisons

29 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome№ of participants(studies)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
All cause SAEs ‐ HD‐ICS/LABA vs MD‐ICS LABA№ of participants: 7511(8 RCTs)
RR 1.03 [0.83, 1.29]8 studies · 7511 participantsHigh
All cause SAEs ‐ MD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 3187(3 RCTs)
RR 1.13 [0.85, 1.5]3 studies · 3187 participantsModerate
All cause SAEs ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2039(2 RCTs)
RR 1.05 [0.76, 1.47]2 studies · 2039 participantsModerate
All cause SAEs ‐ MD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2660(2 RCTs)
RR 1.08 [0.81, 1.44]2 studies · 2660 participantsModerate
All cause SAEs ‐ HD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 5004(4 RCTs)
RR 0.95 [0.77, 1.18]4 studies · 5004 participantsModerate
All cause SAEs ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD TRIPLE№ of participants: 2998(3 RCTs)
RR 0.96 [0.72, 1.27]3 studies · 2998 participantsModerate
All cause SAEs ‐ TRIPLE vs DUAL№ of participants: 8192(6 RCTs)
RR 1.03 [0.87, 1.21]6 studies · 8192 participantsHigh
Asthma‐related SAEs ‐ HD‐ICS/LABA vs MD‐ICS LABA№ of participants: 6244(6 RCTs)
RR 1.33 [0.8, 2.21]6 studies · 6244 participantsHigh
Asthma‐related SAEs ‐ MD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 3188(3 RCTs)
RR 1.52 [0.85, 2.69]3 studies · 3188 participantsModerate
Asthma‐related SAEs ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2039(2 RCTs)
RR 0.86 [0.41, 1.8]2 studies · 2039 participantsHigh
Asthma‐related SAEs ‐ MD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2660(2 RCTs)
RR 1.35 [0.77, 2.36]2 studies · 2660 participantsModerate
Asthma‐related SAEs ‐ HD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 5004(4 RCTs)
RR 0.86 [0.58, 1.27]4 studies · 5004 participantsHigh
Asthma‐related SAEs ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD TRIPLE№ of participants: 3472(3 RCTs)
RR 0.57 [0.31, 1.05]3 studies · 3472 participantsHigh
Asthma‐related SAEs ‐ TRIPLE vs DUAL№ of participants: 8192(6 RCTs)
RR 1.04 [0.76, 1.42]6 studies · 8192 participantsHigh
All cause AEs ‐ HD‐ICS/LABA vs MD‐ICS LABA№ of participants: 5949(7 RCTs)
RR 1.01 [0.97, 1.06]7 studies · 5949 participantsHigh
All cause AEs ‐ MD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 3188(3 RCTs)
RR 0.96 [0.91, 1]3 studies · 3188 participantsModerate
All cause AEs ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2039(2 RCTs)
RR 0.92 [0.85, 1]2 studies · 2039 participantsModerate
All cause AEs ‐ MD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2659(2 RCTs)
RR 0.99 [0.83, 1.18]2 studies · 2659 participantsLow
All cause AEs ‐ HD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 5004(4 RCTs)
RR 0.91 [0.87, 0.96]4 studies · 5004 participantsHigh
All cause AEs ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD TRIPLE№ of participants: 3473(3 RCTs)
RR 0.95 [0.9, 1.02]3 studies · 3473 participantsModerate
All cause AEs ‐ TRIPLE vs DUAL№ of participants: 8192(6 RCTs)
RR 0.93 [0.9, 0.96]6 studies · 8192 participantsHigh
Dropouts due to adverse event ‐ HD‐ICS/LABA vs MD‐ICS LABA№ of participants: 5969(7 RCTs)
RR 1 [0.68, 1.48]7 studies · 5969 participantsHigh
Dropouts due to adverse event ‐ MD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 3205(3 RCTs)
RR 0.42 [0.08, 2.14]3 studies · 3205 participantsVery low
Dropouts due to adverse event ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2670(2 RCTs)
RR 0.47 [0.19, 1.18]2 studies · 2670 participantsModerate
Dropouts due to adverse event ‐ MD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2668(2 RCTs)
RR 1.24 [0.76, 2.02]2 studies · 2668 participantsModerate
Dropouts due to adverse event ‐ HD TRIPLE vs HD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 5018(4 RCTs)
RR 0.6 [0.38, 0.95]4 studies · 5018 participantsHigh
Dropouts due to adverse event ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD TRIPLE№ of participants: 1765(2 RCTs)
RR 1 [0.29, 3.44]2 studies · 1765 participantsModerate
Dropouts due to adverse event ‐ TRIPLE vs DUAL№ of participants: 8223(5 RCTs)
RR 0.59 [0.33, 1.03]5 studies · 8223 participantsModerate

NMA Summary of Findings for asthma‐related SAEs

Population: Adolescent sand adults with symptomatic asthma Interventions: HD‐ICS/LABA, MD‐TRIPLE, HD‐TRIPLE Comparator (reference): Medium‐Dose ICS/LABA (MD‐ICS/LABA) Outcome: Asthma‐related serious adverse events (SAEs) Setting(s): Outpatient
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Total studies: 11 RCTs Total Participants: 13209
no estimate extracted11 studies · 13209 participantsUngraded
HD‐ICS/LABA (Direct evidence; 6 RCTs; 6244 participants)
no estimate extracted6 studies · 6244 participantsHigh
MD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 3 RCTs; 3188 participants)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 3188 participantsModerate
HD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 2 RCTs; 2039 participants)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 2039 participantsHigh
MD‐ICS/LABA
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

NMA Summary of Findings for all‐cause AEs

Population: Adolescents and adults with symptomatic asthma Interventions: HD‐ICS/LABA, MD‐TRIPLE, HD‐TRIPLE Comparator (reference): Medium‐Dose ICS/LABA (MD‐ICS/LABA) Outcome: All‐cause adverse events (AEs) Setting(s): Outpatient
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Total studies: 12 RCTs Total Participants: 12915
no estimate extracted12 studies · 12915 participantsUngraded
HD‐ICS/LABA (Direct evidence; 7 RCTs; 5949 participants)
no estimate extracted7 studies · 5949 participantsHigh
MD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 3 RCTs; 3188 participants)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 3188 participantsModerate
HD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 2 RCTs; 2039 participants)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 2039 participantsHigh
MD‐ICS/LABA
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

NMA summary of findings table for dropouts due to AEs

Population: Adolescents and adults with symptomatic asthma Interventions: HD‐ICS/LABA, MD‐TRIPLE, HD‐TRIPLE Comparator (reference): Medium‐Dose ICS/LABA (MD‐ICS/LABA) Outcome: Dropouts due to adverse events (AEs) Setting(s): Outpatient
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Total studies: 12 RCTs Total Participants: 12915
no estimate extracted12 studies · 12915 participantsUngraded
HD‐ICS/LABA (Direct evidence; 7 RCTs; 5969 participants)
no estimate extracted7 studies · 5969 participantsHigh
MD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 3 RCTs; 3205 participants)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 3205 participantsModerate
HD‐TRIPLE (Direct evidence; 2 RCTs; 2051 participants)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 2051 participantsModerate
MD‐ICS/LABA
no estimate extractedNRNo studies