Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

152 questions · 152 findings · 19 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 13 · 8.6%GRADE not reported 23 · 15.1%Very low 66 · 43.4%Low 20 · 13.2%Moderate 20 · 13.2%High 10 · 6.6%

Pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa‐Vec) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care

Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 12 months) · participants with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

It is very uncertain whether pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa‐Vec) plus best supportive care changes overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with best supportive care alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa‐Vec) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care

Proportion of people with ≥ 1 serious adverse events (at 20 months) · participants with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

It is very uncertain whether pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa‐Vec) plus best supportive care changes proportion of people with ≥ 1 serious adverse events (at 20 months) compared with best supportive care alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa‐Vec) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care

Disease progression · participants with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

It is very uncertain whether pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa‐Vec) plus best supportive care changes proportion of people with disease progression compared with best supportive care alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa‐Vec) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care

Adverse events considered non‐serious · participants with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

It is very uncertain whether pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa‐Vec) plus best supportive care changes adverse events considered non‐serious (number of participants) compared with best supportive care alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Supportive care only*** (1 RCT, 81 participants) · elderly people with newly diagnosed glioblastoma Interventions: radiotherapy with 40 Gy in 15 fractions (RT40); radiotherapy with 60 Gy in…
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Overall survival · patients with extensive SCLC who relapsed or progressed after first‐line chemotherapy

The intervention may leads to lower overall survival (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Quality of life · patients with extensive SCLC who relapsed or progressed after first‐line chemotherapy

The intervention may leads to higher quality of life (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review