Marginal bone level change · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year
NobelActive external connection implants showed no clear difference in marginal bone level change compared with nobelReplace implants; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Marginal bone level change · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year
NobelActive internal connection implants led to lower marginal bone level change compared with nobel Speedy Groovy external connection implants; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Marginal bone level change · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants
Immediate loading showed no clear difference in marginal bone level changes compared with early loading; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
MD -0.06 [-0.16, 0.03]
3 studies
GRADE not reported
Marginal bone level change · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants
Occlusal loading showed no clear difference in marginal bone level changes compared with non-occlusal loading; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
MD 0.03 [-0.10, 0.15]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Marginal bone level change · Patients who have had radiotherapy and who have missing teeth that require replacement with osseointegrated dental implants
1 finding from 1 review
Marginal bone level change · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants
Immediate loading led to lower marginal bone level changes compared with conventional loading; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
MD -0.10 [-0.20, -0.01]
9 studies
GRADE not reported
Marginal bone level change · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants
Early loading showed no clear difference in marginal bone level changes compared with conventional loading; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
MD -0.04 [-0.15, 0.07]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Marginal bone level change · Partially edentulous patients receiving posterior mandibular implants
Subepithelial connective tissue graft (palate) at implant placement showed no clear difference in peri-implant marginal bone level change compared with no augmentation; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Alveolar bone height · Partially edentulous patients with a distal-extension RDP (minor connector); cross-over
1 finding from 1 review
Prosthesis survival and crestal bone loss (5 years) · Patients with tooth/implant-supported FDPs; split-mouth
1 finding from 1 review
Marginal bone level change · People with dental implants
Flapless implant placement showed no clear difference in peri-implant marginal bone level change compared with conventional flap elevation; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Alveolar bone level · Patients with single-tooth implants receiving implant crowns; split-mouth
1 finding from 1 review
Abutment/crown fracture and marginal bone level (3 years) · Patients with single-tooth implant crowns; split-mouth, 3-year
1 finding from 1 review
No fractures of any abutments or crowns; non-significant differences in mean marginal bone levels, which ranged from 1.6 to 2.1 mm (narrative)
1 study · 22 participants
GRADE not reported
Alveolar bone loss · Partially edentulous patients (mandible) receiving FDPs; split-mouth, 10-year
1 finding from 1 review
Marginal bone level change · Patients with compromised teeth to be extracted who require single dental implants in fresh postextraction sockets
Immediate-delayed implants (placed within 8 weeks after tooth… showed no clear difference in perimplant marginal bone level changes compared with delayed implants (placed at least 2 months after extraction); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Marginal bone level change · Patients with compromised teeth to be extracted who require single dental implants in fresh postextraction sockets
Immediate implants (placed just after tooth extraction) showed no clear difference in perimplant marginal bone level changes compared with immediate-delayed implants (placed within 8 weeks after tooth…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Marginal bone level change · People with dental implants
1-stage (non-submerged) implant placement showed no clear difference in radiographic marginal bone level changes compared with 2-stage (submerged) implant placement; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Augmentation procedure (partial) failure · Patients with vertically deficient posterior/anterior mandibular ridges needing implants
Vertical distraction osteogenesis showed no clear difference in augmentation procedure (partial) failure compared with autogenous onlay bone graft (mandibular ramus); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Complications · Patients with vertically deficient posterior/anterior mandibular ridges needing implants
Vertical distraction osteogenesis showed no clear difference in complications compared with autogenous inlay bone graft (iliac crest); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Complication at augmentation + donor site · Patients with vertically deficient posterior/anterior mandibular ridges needing implants
Vertical distraction osteogenesis showed no clear difference in complication at augmented + donor site compared with autogenous onlay bone graft (mandibular ramus); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review