Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

668 questions · 685 findings · 68 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 181 · 26.4%GRADE not reported 16 · 2.3%Very low 151 · 22%Low 211 · 30.8%Moderate 98 · 14.3%High 28 · 4.1%

Longer vs shorter duration of combination nicotine replacement therapy

SAEs · people who smoke

It is very uncertain whether longer changes overall SAEs ‐ 26 weeks versus 8 weeks compared with shorter duration of combination nicotine replacement therapy (very low certainty).

3 findings from 1 review

Subgroup analyses: early vs standard initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT)

Death by AKI aetiology: non‐surgical causes · AKI

Subgroup analyses: early showed no clear difference in death by AKI aetiology: non‐surgical causes compared with standard initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Subgroup analyses: early vs standard initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT)

Kidney recovery functionby KRT: continuous KRT · AKI

Subgroup analyses: early showed no clear difference in kidney recovery functionby KRT: continuous KRT compared with standard initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Subgroup analyses: early vs standard initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT)

Kidney recovery functionby KRT: continuous and intermittent KRT · AKI

Subgroup analyses: early showed no clear difference in kidney recovery functionby KRT: continuous and intermittent KRT compared with standard initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Early vs standard initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT)

Recovery of kidney function Patients free from KRT according to ITT analysis (all patients) · AKI

Early showed no clear difference in recovery of kidney function Patients free from KRT according to ITT… compared with standard initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs surgical aortic valve replacement

All‐cause mortality · adults with severe aortic stenosis who are at a low surgical risk.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs surgical aortic valve replacement

Stroke · adults with severe aortic stenosis who are at a low surgical risk.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation showed no clear difference in stroke compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs surgical aortic valve replacement

Patient readmissions · adults with severe aortic stenosis who are at a low surgical risk.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation showed no clear difference in rehospitalisation compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review