Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

1,266 questions · 1,314 findings · 160 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 309 · 23.5%GRADE not reported 34 · 2.6%Very low 356 · 27.1%Low 393 · 29.9%Moderate 187 · 14.2%High 35 · 2.7%

Medical abortion procedures: mid‐level providers vs doctors

Complications (observational studies) Verifier assessment · Patients requesting abortion procedures

1 finding from 1 review

Doctors or mid‐level providers for abortion 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1164 participants
Very low

Medical abortion procedures: mid‐level providers vs doctors

Failure/incomplete abortion (RCTs) Provider assessment · Patients requesting abortion procedures

Medical abortion procedures: mid‐level providers showed no clear difference in failure/incomplete abortion (RCTs) Provider assessment compared with doctors (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Doctors or mid‐level providers for abortion 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.81 [0.48, 1.36]
2 studies · 1892 participants
High

Medical abortion procedures: mid‐level providers vs doctors

Failure/incomplete abortion (observational studies) Verifier assessment · Patients requesting abortion procedures

It is very uncertain whether medical abortion procedures: mid‐level providers changes failure/incomplete abortion (observational studies) Verifier… compared with doctors (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Doctors or mid‐level providers for abortion 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.09 [0.63, 1.88]
1 study · 1164 participants
Very low

Medical abortion procedures: mid‐level providers vs doctors

Complications (RCTs) Provider assessment · Patients requesting abortion procedures

1 finding from 1 review

Doctors or mid‐level providers for abortion 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 1892 participants
High

Culturally and literacy adapted medical instruction vs no health literacy intervention

Outcome category – outcome(s)* · migrants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving health literacy in migrants 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Culturally and literacy adapted medical instruction vs no health literacy intervention

Health literacy – Medication understanding Multiple measures used: Demonstration by means of correct dosage in dosing tray (0 to 5) Correct interpretation of label contents, 11 labels MUQ (score · migrants

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving health literacy in migrants 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 478 participants
Low

Culturally and literacy adapted medical instruction vs no health literacy intervention

Quality of life ‐ not measured · migrants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving health literacy in migrants 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Culturally and literacy adapted medical instruction vs no health literacy intervention

Health outcome – not measured · migrants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving health literacy in migrants 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Culturally and literacy adapted medical instruction vs no health literacy intervention

Health‐related knowledge – not measured · migrants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving health literacy in migrants 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Culturally and literacy adapted medical instruction vs no health literacy intervention

Medication adherence (continuous) · migrants

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving health literacy in migrants 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 200 participants
Low

Culturally and literacy adapted medical instruction vs no health literacy intervention

Health service use – not measured · migrants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving health literacy in migrants 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Culturally and literacy adapted medical instruction vs no health literacy intervention

Self‐efficacy ‐ not measured · migrants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving health literacy in migrants 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Culturally and literacy adapted medical instruction vs no health literacy intervention

Adverse events ‐ not measured · migrants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving health literacy in migrants 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Alpha‐blocker as adjuvant medical expulsive therapy plus usual care vs usual care

Stone clearance assessed by imaging · adults with renal and ureteral stones undergoing shock wave lithotripsy

1 finding from 1 review

Alpha‐blockers after shock wave lithotripsy for renal or ureteral stones in adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
36 studies · 4084 participants
Low

Alpha‐blocker as adjuvant medical expulsive therapy plus usual care vs usual care

Auxiliary treatment · adults with renal and ureteral stones undergoing shock wave lithotripsy

1 finding from 1 review

Alpha‐blockers after shock wave lithotripsy for renal or ureteral stones in adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
12 studies · 1251 participants
Low

Alpha‐blocker as adjuvant medical expulsive therapy plus usual care vs usual care

Major adverse events · adults with renal and ureteral stones undergoing shock wave lithotripsy

1 finding from 1 review

Alpha‐blockers after shock wave lithotripsy for renal or ureteral stones in adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
7 studies · 747 participants
Low

Alpha‐blocker as adjuvant medical expulsive therapy plus usual care vs usual care

Quality of life · adults with renal and ureteral stones undergoing shock wave lithotripsy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Alpha‐blockers after shock wave lithotripsy for renal or ureteral stones in adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Alpha‐blocker as adjuvant medical expulsive therapy plus usual care vs usual care

Stone clearance time measured in daysÂ · adults with renal and ureteral stones undergoing shock wave lithotripsy

1 finding from 1 review

Alpha‐blockers after shock wave lithotripsy for renal or ureteral stones in adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
14 studies · 1790 participants
Low

Medical or surgical intervention, or both, for gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease vs nil intervention, delayed intervention control, or placebo

Exacerbations: number of people experiencing moderate or severe exacerbations · treatment for asthma in adults and children with asthma and GORD

Medical or surgical intervention, or both, for gastro‐oesophageal… showed no clear difference in number of participants with moderate/severe acute exacerbations… compared with nil intervention, delayed intervention control, or placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pharmacological and surgical interventions for the treatment of gastro‐oesophageal reflux in adults and children with… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.53 [0.17, 1.63]
2 studies · 1168 participants
Low

Medical or surgical intervention, or both, for gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease vs nil intervention, delayed intervention control, or placebo

Lung function: FEV1 mL (change from baseline) · treatment for asthma in adults and children with asthma and GORD

1 finding from 1 review

Pharmacological and surgical interventions for the treatment of gastro‐oesophageal reflux in adults and children with… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
7 studies · 1333 participants
Moderate