Cochrane · systematic review · CD001496

Pharmacological and surgical interventions for the treatment of gastro‐oesophageal reflux in adults and children with asthma

Kopsaftis, Z, Yap, HS, Tin, KS, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2021 · Cochrane Library

AirwaysAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
5
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
1
Included studies
NR
No studies 1 · 20%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 40%Moderate 2 · 40%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Medical or surgical intervention, or both, for gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease compared to nil intervention, delayed intervention control, or placebo for asthma in adults and children

Population: treatment for asthma in adults and children with asthma and GORD
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Number of participants with moderate/severe acute exacerbations Duration of treatment: range 24 weeks to 26 weeks
Medical or surgical intervention, or both, for gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease vs nil intervention, delayed intervention control, or placebo
OR 0.53 [0.17, 1.63]2 studies · 1168 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Change in FEV₁ (L) Duration of treatment: range 6 weeks to 26 weeks
Medical or surgical intervention, or both, for gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease vs nil intervention, delayed intervention control, or placebo
no estimate extracted7 studies · 1333 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Use of "rescue" medications and emergency action plans: B2 use puffs per day Duration of treatment: range 14 weeks to 24 weeks
Medical or surgical intervention, or both, for gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease vs nil intervention, delayed intervention control, or placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 239 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Change in quality of life
Medical or surgical intervention, or both, for gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease vs nil intervention, delayed intervention control, or placebo
no estimate extracted5 studies · 1595 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Healthcare utilisation ‐ not measured
Medical or surgical intervention, or both, for gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease vs nil intervention, delayed intervention control, or placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies