Laxation response: patient assessment of change in bowel status at the end of trial · people receiving palliative care irrespective of whether they had cancer with opioid‐induced bowel dysfunction
Methylnaltrexone lower dose showed no clear difference in laxation response: patient assessment of change in bowel statusgat… compared with higher dose (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Symptoms of opioid withdrawal in the medium term · people receiving palliative care irrespective of whether they had cancer with opioid‐induced bowel dysfunction
Methylnaltrexone lower dose showed no clear difference in symptoms of opioid withdrawal in the medium term compared with higher dose (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events · people receiving palliative care irrespective of whether they had cancer with opioid‐induced bowel dysfunction
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events · people receiving palliative care irrespective of whether they had cancer with opioid‐induced bowel dysfunction
Methylnaltrexone lower dose showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with higher dose (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Total mortality · cardiovascular disease with high blood pressure
Lower blood pressure targets showed no clear difference in total mortality compared with standard blood pressure targets (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Total serious adverse events · cardiovascular disease with high blood pressure
Lower blood pressure targets showed no clear difference in total serious adverse events compared with standard blood pressure targets (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Cardiovascular events · cardiovascular disease with high blood pressure
Lower blood pressure targets showed no clear difference in total cardiovascular events compared with standard blood pressure targets (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Cardiovascular mortality · cardiovascular disease with high blood pressure
Lower blood pressure targets showed no clear difference in cardiovascular mortality compared with standard blood pressure targets (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Withdrawals due to adverse events · cardiovascular disease with high blood pressure
It is very uncertain whether lower blood pressure targets changes participant withdrawals due to adverse effects compared with standard blood pressure targets (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Secondary malignant neoplasms · Patients with untreated Hodgkin lymphoma (early stages)
Chemotherapy plus lower‐dose radiation showed no clear difference in secondary malignant neoplasms compared with same chemotherapy plus higher‐dose radiation (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Death · Patients with untreated Hodgkin lymphoma (early stages)
Chemotherapy plus lower‐dose radiation showed no clear difference in death compared with same chemotherapy plus higher‐dose radiation (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Progression/relapse · Patients with untreated Hodgkin lymphoma (early stages)
Chemotherapy plus lower‐dose radiation showed no clear difference in progression/relapse compared with same chemotherapy plus higher‐dose radiation (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Leaving the study early (2‐10 weeks) vs. standard higher dose (> 7.5‐15 mg/day) · people with the acute phase of schizophrenia
It is very uncertain whether STANDARD LOWER DOSE (> 3 to 7.5 mg/day) changes leaving the study early (2‐10 weeks) vs. standard higher dose (>… compared with OTHER DOSES (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Leaving the study early · people with the acute phase of schizophrenia
It is very uncertain whether STANDARD LOWER DOSE (> 3 to 7.5 mg/day) changes leaving the study early (2‐10 weeks) vs. high dose (> 15‐35 mg/day) compared with OTHER DOSES (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Global state: No clinically significant response (as defined by the original studies) · people with the acute phase of schizophrenia
It is very uncertain whether STANDARD LOWER DOSE (> 3 to 7.5 mg/day) changes global state: 1. No clinically significant response in global state… compared with OTHER DOSES (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Global state: 1. No clinically significant response in global state (2‐10 weeks) vs. high dose (> 15‐35 mg/day) · people with the acute phase of schizophrenia
It is very uncertain whether STANDARD LOWER DOSE (> 3 to 7.5 mg/day) changes global state: 1. No clinically significant response in global state… compared with OTHER DOSES (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse effects: 1. Clinically significant extrapyramidal side effects (2‐10 weeks) vs. standard higher dose (> 7.5‐15 mg/day) · people with the acute phase of schizophrenia
It is very uncertain whether STANDARD LOWER DOSE (> 3 to 7.5 mg/day) changes adverse effects: 1. Clinically significant extrapyramidal side… compared with OTHER DOSES (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse effects: 1. Clinically significant extrapyramidal side effects (2‐10 weeks) vs. high dose (> 15‐35 mg/day) · people with the acute phase of schizophrenia
It is very uncertain whether STANDARD LOWER DOSE (> 3 to 7.5 mg/day) changes adverse effects: 1. Clinically significant extrapyramidal side… compared with OTHER DOSES (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Specific behaviour ‐ agitation · people with the acute phase of schizophrenia
It is very uncertain whether STANDARD LOWER DOSE (> 3 to 7.5 mg/day) changes mental state/behaviour: clinically significant agitation (2‐10 weeks) compared with OTHER DOSES (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Maternal death · women with eclampsia
It is very uncertain whether treatment of eclampsia: lower‐dose regimens changes maternal death compared with standard‐dose regimens (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review