Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

143 questions · 148 findings · 21 reviews · ENT

No studies found 67 · 45.3%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 59 · 39.9%Low 16 · 10.8%Moderate 6 · 4.1%High 0 · 0%

Intervention not reported

Use of verbal communication strategy Validated self‐report measures (verbal subscale of the CPHI (Demorest 1987)). Scale from: 0 to 5 · adults with hearing loss who use hearing aids
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Self‐reported hearing handicap Validated self‐report measure: HHIE (Ventry 1982) scale from 0 to 100 · adults with hearing loss who use hearing aids
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Communication Validated self‐report measure: verbal subscale of the CPHI (Demorest 1987) scale from 0 to 5 · adults with hearing loss who use hearing aids
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Adherence Number of people fitted with hearing aid/number of people who use the aids · adults with hearing loss who use hearing aids

The intervention showed no clear difference in adherence Number of people fitted with hearing aid/number of people… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Daily hours of hearing aid use Average self‐reported or data‐logged hours of use per day. Scale from: 0 to 12 hours · adults with hearing loss who use hearing aids
1 finding from 1 review

Antibiotic eardrops (with or without a corticosteroid) vs oral antibiotics

Resolution of ear discharge at short‐term

Antibiotic eardrops (with or without a corticosteroid) probably leads to higher resolution of ear discharge at short‐term compared with oral antibiotics (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Antibiotic eardrops (with or without a corticosteroid) vs oral antibiotics

Resolution of ear discharge at intermediate‐term

Antibiotic eardrops (with or without a corticosteroid) probably leads to higher resolution of ear discharge at intermediate‐term compared with oral antibiotics (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Patient‐reported disease‐specific symptom scores Symptom score with scale of 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 3 = severe symptoms)

The intervention showed no clear difference in patient‐reported disease‐specific symptom scores Symptom score with… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Health‐related quality of life scores, measured by SF‐36 (range 0 to 100)

The intervention showed no clear difference in health‐related quality of life scores, measured by SF‐36 (range 0 to… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Endoscopic appearances 0 to 3 (0 = no polyps, 3 = severe polyposis)

The intervention showed no clear difference in endoscopic appearances 0 to 3 (0 = no polyps, 3 = severe polyposis) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review