Question · asked by 1 review
Antibiotic eardrops (with or without a corticosteroid) vs oral antibiotics: Adverse events
- Population
- Not specified
- Intervention
- Antibiotic eardrops (with or without a corticosteroid)
- Comparison
- oral antibiotics
- Outcome
- Adverse events
Antibiotic eardrops (with or without a corticosteroid) showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with oral antibiotics (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Antibiotic eardrops (with or without a corticosteroid) vs oral antibiotics Adverse events Antibiotic eardrops (with or without a corticosteroid) showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with oral antibiotics (low certainty). Interventions for children with ear discharge occurring at least two weeks following grommet (ventilation… (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.37 [0.12, 1.09] | 3 studies · 705 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for children with ear discharge occurring at least two weeks following grommet (ventilation tube) insertion 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.