Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

126 questions · 178 findings · 21 reviews · All outcomes

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 32 · 18%GRADE not reported 113 · 63.5%Very low 14 · 7.9%Low 13 · 7.3%Moderate 6 · 3.4%High 0 · 0%

Pre-radiotherapy extraction of diseased molar teeth vs Conservative treatment (restoration of the teeth and leaving them in place during radiotherapy, with oral health education and disease prevention: oral hygiene, fluoride, diet advice)

Overall survival · Patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer planned to undergo any type of radiotherapy (external beam, intensity modulated,…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Dental extractions prior to radiotherapy to the jaws for reducing post‐radiotherapy dental complications 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
no estimate extracted
0 studies
No studies found

Monitoring (any means of observation, supervision, keeping under review, measuring or testing at intervals) vs No monitoring

Quality of life: Chronic pain · People with serious mental illness (all included participants had schizophrenia); majority aged 18 to 65 years per NIMH 1987, or with…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Oral health education (advice and training) for people with serious mental illness 2016 · Cochrane All outcomes
No study reported useable data
0 studies
No studies found

Monitoring (any means of observation, supervision, keeping under review, measuring or testing at intervals) vs No monitoring

Service use: Emergency medical/dental treatment · People with serious mental illness (all included participants had schizophrenia); majority aged 18 to 65 years per NIMH 1987, or with…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Oral health education (advice and training) for people with serious mental illness 2016 · Cochrane All outcomes
No study reported useable data
0 studies
No studies found

Monitoring (any means of observation, supervision, keeping under review, measuring or testing at intervals) vs No monitoring

Adverse events: Clinically important specific adverse events · People with serious mental illness (all included participants had schizophrenia); majority aged 18 to 65 years per NIMH 1987, or with…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Oral health education (advice and training) for people with serious mental illness 2016 · Cochrane All outcomes
No study reported useable data
0 studies
No studies found

Monitoring (any means of observation, supervision, keeping under review, measuring or testing at intervals) vs No monitoring

Dental state: No clinically important change in plaque index · People with serious mental illness (all included participants had schizophrenia); majority aged 18 to 65 years per NIMH 1987, or with…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Oral health education (advice and training) for people with serious mental illness 2016 · Cochrane All outcomes
See comment; Not estimable; 0 (0 studies); no study reported useable data
0 studies
No studies found

Monitoring (any means of observation, supervision, keeping under review, measuring or testing at intervals) vs No monitoring

Leaving the study early · People with serious mental illness (all included participants had schizophrenia); majority aged 18 to 65 years per NIMH 1987, or with…

Monitoring (any means of observation, supervision, keeping under… showed no clear difference in leaving the study early compared with no monitoring (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral health education (advice and training) for people with serious mental illness 2016 · Cochrane All outcomes
RR 1.07 [1.00, 1.14]
1 study · 1682 participants
Moderate