Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,036 questions · 1,100 findings · 261 reviews

No studies found 160 · 14.5%GRADE not reported 188 · 17.1%Very low 270 · 24.5%Low 303 · 27.5%Moderate 139 · 12.6%High 40 · 3.6%

Intervention not reported

Breast cancer stage at the time of presentation: defined as the proportion of women with breast cancer diagnosed at late stage (stage III, IV) Time of outcome assessment: 3 years to 20 years Method of measurement: CBE · health workers

The intervention may leads to lower breast cancer stage at the time of presentation: defined as the… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Breast cancer mortality: defined as deaths among women who received a diagnosis of breast cancer Time of outcome assessment: 3 years to 20 years Method of measurement: death registration offices, hospital records, and house visits · health workers

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes breast cancer mortality: defined as deaths among women who received… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Pain intensity measured on CHQ (0‐100; 0 = worse pain), and VAS (0 to 100; 0 = no pain) Postintervention: first assessment after end of treatment; no later than 3 months · children and adolescents aged 4 years to 18 years, with chronic musculoskeletal pain
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Quality of life measured on multiple scales (0 to 100; higher score = better quality of life) Postintervention: first assessment after end of treatment; no later than 3 months · children and adolescents aged 4 years to 18 years, with chronic musculoskeletal pain
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Outcomes, Time point of assessment · relatives, patients, and healthcare professionals during resucitation

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings. Peer reviewer training vs standard journal practice or no training

Stakeholders' assessment of review quality (change score) Assessed using either:A) a 5‐point scale, change scores range from −4 to 4 (3 studies);B) a 5‐point scale, expressed by "slope of quality score change"(1 study); orC) the MQAI, from −144 to... · peer reviewers
1 finding from 1 review

Methylnaltrexone vs placebo

Laxation response: patient assessment of change in bowel status at the end of trial · people receiving palliative care irrespective of whether they had cancer with opioid‐induced bowel dysfunction

Methylnaltrexone may leads to higher laxation response: patient assessment of change in bowel statusgat… compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review