evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

291 questions · 293 findings · 75 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 56 · 19.1%GRADE not reported 24 · 8.2%Very low 61 · 20.8%Low 62 · 21.2%Moderate 39 · 13.3%High 51 · 17.4%

Comparison of plasma transfusions vs no plasma transfusions when the INR is 1.5 prior to central venous catheter insertion

Proportion of participants receiving plasma transfusions · people with abnormal coagulation requiring a central venous catheter

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

mg/day LDL cholesterol · participants with normal or abnormal lipid profiles

The intervention showed no clear difference in mg/day LDL cholesterol (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

mg/day LDL cholesterol · participants with normal or abnormal lipid profiles

The intervention showed no clear difference in mg/day LDL cholesterol (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

mg/day LDL cholesterol · participants with normal or abnormal lipid profiles

The intervention showed no clear difference in mg/day LDL cholesterol (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

mg/day LDL cholesterol · participants with normal or abnormal lipid profiles

The intervention showed no clear difference in mg/day LDL cholesterol (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Pravastatin 10 to 80 mg/day (6 to 156 weeks) · participants with normal or abnormal lipid profiles

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

WDAEs · participants with normal or abnormal lipid profiles

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes WDAEs (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Caesarean section (all indications) Â · women with an abnormal CTG in labour

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes caesarean section (all indications) Â (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Assisted vaginal birth (all indications) Â · women with an abnormal CTG in labour

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes assisted vaginal birth (all indications) Â (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Spontaneous vaginal birth  · women with an abnormal CTG in labour

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes spontaneous vaginal birth  (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Caesarean section (all indications) · women with an abnormal cardiotocograph (CTG) in labour

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes caesarean section (all indications) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Assisted vaginal birth (all indications) Â · women with an abnormal cardiotocograph (CTG) in labour

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes assisted vaginal birth (all indications) Â (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Spontaneous vaginal birth  · women with an abnormal cardiotocograph (CTG) in labour

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes spontaneous vaginal birth  (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review