Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

2,509 questions · 2,666 findings · 288 reviews

No studies found 743 · 27.9%GRADE not reported 327 · 12.3%Very low 775 · 29.1%Low 484 · 18.2%Moderate 279 · 10.5%High 58 · 2.2%

Repeat midurethral tape (any type) vs any other non‐tape surgical treatment (e.g. traditional sling, colposuspension, injectables)

Number of women whose incontinence was improved or cured ‐ · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Repeat midurethral tape (any type) vs any other non‐tape surgical treatment (e.g. traditional sling, colposuspension, injectables)

Objective cure rates in the longer‐term ‐ more than 12 months, · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Repeat midurethral tape (any type) vs any other non‐tape surgical treatment (e.g. traditional sling, colposuspension, injectables)

General health status evaluation e.g. Short Form (SF)‐36 ‐ not reported · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Repeat midurethral tape (any type) vs any other non‐tape surgical treatment (e.g. traditional sling, colposuspension, injectables)

Condition‐specific instruments designed to assess incontinence ‐ e.g. BFLUTS · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Repeat midurethral tape (any type) vs any other non‐tape surgical treatment (e.g. traditional sling, colposuspension, injectables)

Repeat surgery for urinary incontinence · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Repeat midurethral tape (any type) vs any other non‐tape surgical treatment (e.g. traditional sling, colposuspension, injectables)

Adverse events · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Proportion free from seizures at 1 year · adults and children with drug‐resistant epilepsy suitable for surgical intervention

The intervention may leads to higher proportion free from seizures at 1 year (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review
  • Surgery for epilepsy 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
    RR 9.78 [4.73, 20.21]
    2 studies · 196 participants
    Low

Intervention not reported

Proportion free from all seizures (including auras) at 1 year · adults and children with drug‐resistant epilepsy suitable for surgical intervention

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes proportion free from all seizures (including auras) at 1 year (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review
  • Surgery for epilepsy 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
    RR 15 [2.08, 108.23]
    1 study · 80 participants
    Very low

Intervention not reported

Proportion free from seizures (Engel Class 1 or 1A) at 1 year and at 5 years · adults and children with drug‐resistant epilepsy suitable for surgical intervention
1 finding from 1 review
  • Surgery for epilepsy 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
    no estimate extracted
    1 study · 43 participants
    Low

Intervention not reported

P roportion with remission of seizures (at least Engel Class IB) between 25 and 36 months · adults and children with drug‐resistant epilepsy suitable for surgical intervention

The intervention may leads to lower P roportion with remission of seizures (at least Engel Class IB)… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review
  • Surgery for epilepsy 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
    RR 0.66 [0.45, 0.99]
    1 study · 58 participants
    Low

Intervention not reported

Proportion free from seizures (Engel Class 1) at 1 year · adults and children with drug‐resistant epilepsy suitable for surgical intervention

The intervention showed no clear difference in proportion free from seizures (Engel Class 1) at 1 year (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review
  • Surgery for epilepsy 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
    RR 1.14 [0.76, 1.7]
    1 study · 43 participants
    Low

Intervention not reported

Proportion free from seizures (Engel Class 1) at 2 years · adults and children with drug‐resistant epilepsy suitable for surgical intervention

The intervention showed no clear difference in proportion free from seizures (Engel Class 1) at 2 years (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review
  • Surgery for epilepsy 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
    RR 1.22 [0.85, 1.76]
    1 study · 60 participants
    Moderate

Intervention not reported

Proportion free from all seizures (including auras, ILAE 1a) at 1 year · adults and children with drug‐resistant epilepsy suitable for surgical intervention

The intervention showed no clear difference in proportion free from all seizures (including auras, ILAE 1a) at 1 year (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review
  • Surgery for epilepsy 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
    RR 0.92 [0.59, 1.46]
    1 study · 47 participants
    Low

Intervention not reported

Proportion free from all seizures (including auras) at 1 year · adults and children with drug‐resistant epilepsy suitable for surgical intervention

The intervention may leads to higher proportion free from all seizures (including auras) at 1 year (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review
  • Surgery for epilepsy 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
    RR 1.82 [1.12, 2.93]
    1 study · 70 participants
    Low