Intervention not reported
Progression‐free survival (PFS) ‐ Network (subnet 1) included 10 pairwise comparisons ‐ Median · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and an intermediate or poor risk according to the International…
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Serious adverse events (SAEs) ‐ Network included 31 pairwise comparisons ‐ Mean risk with SUN across trials3 included in this network: 40.7% · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (combined risk groups) without previous systemic anticancer therapy
The intervention showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (SAEs) ‐ Network included 31 pairwise… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Progression‐free survival (PFS) ‐ Network (subnet 1) included 27 pairwise comparisons ‐ Median · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (combined risk groups) without previous systemic anticancer therapy
The intervention probably leads to lower progression‐free survival (PFS) ‐ Network (subnet 1) included 27… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Adverse events (AEs) (grade 3 or 4) ‐ Network included 19 pairwise comparisons ‐ Mean risk with SUN across trials3 in this network: 70.6% · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (combined risk groups) without previous systemic anticancer therapy
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Time to initiation of first subsequent therapy This outcome was not reported as a time‐to‐event outcome. Instead, authors of the trials reported the number of participants who received subsequent anticancer therapy after discontinuation of trial t... · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (combined risk groups) without previous systemic anticancer therapy
The intervention may leads to lower time to initiation of first subsequent therapy This outcome was not… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
IMDC risk group · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and a favourable risk according to the International Metastatic…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Overall survival (OS) ‐ Network (subnet 1) included 5 pairwise comparisons ‐ Median · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and a favourable risk according to the International Metastatic…
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Serious adverse events · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and a favourable risk according to the International Metastatic…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Overall survival (1‐year · people with pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma
It is very uncertain whether extended changes overall survival (1‐year compared with standard lymph node resection (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Overall survival (3‐year · people with pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma
It is very uncertain whether extended changes overall survival (3‐year compared with standard lymph node resection (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Postoperative mortality (duration of · people with pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma
Extended showed no clear difference in postoperative mortality (duration of compared with standard lymph node resection (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Operating time · people with pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma
1 finding from 1 review
Blood loss · people with pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma
1 finding from 1 review
Lymph nodes retrieved · people with pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma
1 finding from 1 review
Positive resection margins · people with pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma
It is very uncertain whether extended changes positive resection margins (R1 + R2) compared with standard lymph node resection (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
All‐cause mortality at 5 years · people with resectable cholangiocarcinoma
It is very uncertain whether adjuvant chemotherapy changes all‐cause mortality at 5 years compared with no chemotherapy (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events · people with resectable cholangiocarcinoma
It is very uncertain whether adjuvant chemotherapy changes serious adverse events compared with no chemotherapy (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Health‐related quality of life · people with resectable cholangiocarcinoma
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Cancer‐related mortality at maximal · people with resectable cholangiocarcinoma
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Time to recurrence · people with resectable cholangiocarcinoma
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found