Mean GI symptom scores (lower is better) · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer
Summary of findings: Counselling showed no clear difference in mean GI symptom scores (lower is better) compared with no intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Diarrhoea (grade 2+) · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer
Summary of findings: Counselling may leads to lower diarrhoea (grade 2+) compared with no intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
QoL · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Counselling changes QOL scores (5‐point VAS; lower is better) compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mean GI symptom scores (lower is better) · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Diarrhoea (grade 2+) · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Protein supplements changes diarrhoea (grade 2+) compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
QoL · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Rate of amputation · patients with Buerger's disease
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Ulcer healing · patients with Buerger's disease
1 finding from 1 review
Pain Measured using a validated pain score or scale, or quality of life questionnaire · patients with Buerger's disease
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse effects Local or systemic inflammatory response, cardiovascular abnormalities, and thromboembolic complications · patients with Buerger's disease
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
30‐Day amputation‐free survival · patients with Buerger's disease
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Pain‐free walking distance · patients with Buerger's disease
1 finding from 1 review
Number recruited · individuals eligible for a trial
Open trial leads to higher number recruited compared with blinded trial (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Number recruited · individuals eligible for a trial
Telephone reminder leads to higher number recruited compared with no telephone reminder (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Willingness to participate/number recruited · individuals eligible for a trial
Bespoke, user‐tested participant information leaflet (PIL) showed no clear difference in willingness to participate/number recruited compared with usual PIL (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Number recruited · individuals eligible for a trial
Brief participant information leaflet (PIL) showed no clear difference in number recruited compared with usual PIL (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Number recruited · individuals eligible for a trial
Participant information leaflet (PIL) developed with feedback from… showed no clear difference in number recruited compared with usual PIL (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Number recruited · individuals eligible for a trial
It is very uncertain whether providing information by video changes number recruited compared with by standard means alone (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review