Cochrane · systematic review · CD012794

Stem cell therapy for treatment of thromboangiitis obliterans (Buerger's disease)

Cacione, DG, do Carmo Novaes, F, Moreno, DH · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2018 · Cochrane Library

VascularAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
2
No studies
4
Included studies
NR
No studies 4 · 66.7%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 33.3%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Stem cell therapy (any source) compared with any other modality of treatment for thromboangiitis obliterans (Buerger's disease)

Population: individuals with thromboangiitis obliterans (Buerger's disease)
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Rate of amputation
Stem cell therapy (any source) vs any other modality of treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Ulcer healing (size area)
Stem cell therapy (any source) vs any other modality of treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 18 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Pain Measured using a validated pain score or scale, or quality of life questionnaire
Stem cell therapy (any source) vs any other modality of treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse effects Local or systemic inflammatory response, cardiovascular abnormalities, and thromboembolic complications
Stem cell therapy (any source) vs any other modality of treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Amputation‐free survival
Stem cell therapy (any source) vs any other modality of treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Pain‐free walking distance
Stem cell therapy (any source) vs any other modality of treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 18 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision