Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,234 questions · 3,357 findings · 396 reviews

No studies found 803 · 23.9%GRADE not reported 270 · 8%Very low 757 · 22.5%Low 859 · 25.6%Moderate 486 · 14.5%High 182 · 5.4%

Summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy vs electrocoagulation

Minor morbidity: total · women > 6 weeks postpartum requesting tubal sterilisation

Summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy may leads to higher minor morbidity: total compared with electrocoagulation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy vs electrocoagulation

Minor morbidity: procedure‐related injuries with no additional operation · women > 6 weeks postpartum requesting tubal sterilisation

Summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy showed no clear difference in minor morbidity: procedure‐related injuries with no additional… compared with electrocoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

self‐management of oral anticoagulation vs usual care

Minor haemorrhage · Patients on long‐term anticoagulant therapy (treatment duration longer than two months) irrespective of the indication for treatment

self‐management of oral anticoagulation showed no clear difference in minor haemorrhage compared with standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐monitoring or self‐management of oral anticoagulation vs usual care

Minor haemorrhage · Patients on long‐term anticoagulant therapy (treatment duration longer than two months) irrespective of the indication for treatment

Self‐monitoring or self‐management of oral anticoagulation showed no clear difference in minor haemorrhage compared with standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐monitoring of oral anticoagulation vs usual care

Minor haemorrhage · Patients on long‐term anticoagulant therapy (treatment duration longer than two months) irrespective of the indication for treatment

Self‐monitoring of oral anticoagulation showed no clear difference in minor haemorrhage compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

DOAC vs placebo

Minor bleeding · people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

DOAC showed no clear difference in bleeding ‐ minor Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vitamin K antagonists vs heparin

Minor bleeding · people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

Vitamin K antagonists showed no clear difference in bleeding ‐ minor Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days compared with heparin (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

DOAC vs heparin

Minor bleeding · people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

DOAC showed no clear difference in bleeding ‐ minor Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days compared with heparin (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Heparin vs placebo

Minor bleeding · people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

Heparin leads to higher bleeding ‐ minor Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days compared with placebo (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review