Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

300 questions · 325 findings · 28 reviews · Effective Practice and Organisation of Care

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 84 · 25.8%GRADE not reported 6 · 1.8%Very low 115 · 35.4%Low 70 · 21.5%Moderate 45 · 13.8%High 5 · 1.5%

Follow‐up integrating additional patient symptom education or monitoring, or survivorship care plans vs usual care

Health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) · adult cancer survivors from the following cancer sites: breast, colorectal, endometrial, ovarian and prostate cancer

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low

Follow‐up integrating additional patient symptom education or monitoring, or survivorship care plans vs usual care

Anxiety · adult cancer survivors from the following cancer sites: breast, colorectal, endometrial, ovarian and prostate cancer

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low

Follow‐up integrating additional patient symptom education or monitoring, or survivorship care plans vs usual care

Depression · adult cancer survivors from the following cancer sites: breast, colorectal, endometrial, ovarian and prostate cancer

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low

Follow‐up integrating additional patient symptom education or monitoring, or survivorship care plans vs usual care

Costs · adult cancer survivors from the following cancer sites: breast, colorectal, endometrial, ovarian and prostate cancer

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low

Request‐based ethics consultation vs usual care

Satisfaction with care · adult participants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Ethical case interventions for adult patients 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Proactive ethics consultation vs usual care

Satisfaction with care · adult participants

1 finding from 1 review

Ethical case interventions for adult patients 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
478 participants
Very low

Summary of findings: feedback on medication adherence to physicians vs usual care

Processes of care Rate of medication change (medication discontinued, added, replaced), proportion of visits with appropriate management of uncontrolled hypertension, patient rating (quality of care, duration of the visit, communication with physi... · any physician, and any patient treated for chronic diseases with long‐term medication use

1 finding from 1 review

Providing physicians with feedback on medication adherence for people with chronic diseases taking long‐term medication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low

Primary health professionals and lay health workers vs usual care

Functional impairment · people with dementia and their carers

1 finding from 1 review

Primary‐level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low‐ and… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 81 participants
Very low

Primary health professionals and lay health workers vs usual care

Service utilisation ‐ home visits by LHW and psychiatrist (during intervention) · people with dementia and their carers

1 finding from 1 review

Primary‐level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low‐ and… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 81 participants
Very low

Primary health professionals and lay health workers vs usual care

Adverse events ‐ number of deaths (during intervention) Â · people with dementia and their carers

1 finding from 1 review

Primary‐level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low‐ and… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 141 participants
Very low

Primary health professionals and lay health workers vs usual care

Clinical illness recovery · people with dementia and their carers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Primary‐level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low‐ and… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Primary health professionals and lay health workers vs usual care

Disease prevalence · people with dementia and their carers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Primary‐level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low‐ and… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Primary health professionals and lay health workers vs usual care

Behavioural symptoms (change from baseline at 26 weeks measured using the NPI) · people with dementia and their carers

1 finding from 1 review

Primary‐level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low‐ and… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 134 participants
Low

Primary health professionals and lay health workers vs usual care

Quality of life (patient) (1 to 6 months post intervention) DEMQOL (higher score = better quality of life) · people with dementia and their carers

1 finding from 1 review

Primary‐level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low‐ and… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 53 participants
Very low

Interventions targeting patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type

Observer‐based SDM measures · patients, including healthcare consumers and simulated patients

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
424 participants
Very low

Interventions targeting patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type

Shared decision making (PROM, continuous) ( · patients, including healthcare consumers and simulated patients

2 findings from 1 review

Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1906 participants
Very low
Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1386 participants
Very low

Interventions targeting patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type

Shared decision making (PROM, categorical or dichotomous) ( · patients, including healthcare consumers and simulated patients

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2272 participants
Very low

Interventions targeting patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type

Decision regret · patients, including healthcare consumers and simulated patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
212 participants
Very low

Interventions targeting patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type

Health‐related quality of life (physical) · patients, including healthcare consumers and simulated patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
116 participants
Very low

Interventions targeting patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type

Health‐related quality of life (mental) · patients, including healthcare consumers and simulated patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
116 participants
Very low