Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

276 questions · 290 findings · 42 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 26 · 9%GRADE not reported 17 · 5.9%Very low 82 · 28.3%Low 92 · 31.7%Moderate 66 · 22.8%High 7 · 2.4%

Summary of findings table ‐ Selective prevention interventions vs control group

Anxiety · preventing mental disorders
2 findings from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Selective prevention interventions vs control group

Distress/PTSD symptoms at study endpoint (higher score = higher severity) · preventing mental disorders
2 findings from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Selective prevention interventions vs control group

Diagnosis of mental disorders at study endpoint · preventing mental disorders
2 findings from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Selective prevention interventions vs control group

QoL · preventing mental disorders
2 findings from 1 review

Intervention vs control

Selective bowel decontamination versus inactive control · people undergoing liver transplantation

It is very uncertain whether intervention changes selective bowel decontamination versus inactive control compared with control (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Intervention vs control

Selective bowel decontamination versus prebiotics with probiotics · people undergoing liver transplantation
2 findings from 1 review

Intervention vs control

Selective bowel decontamination versus prebiotics · people undergoing liver transplantation
2 findings from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Utilisation of research (Thailand) (for six obstetric practices: social support during labour, magnesium sulphate for eclampsia, corticosteroids to women with preterm birth, selective episiotomy, antibiotic use at caesarean section and vacuum extr... · Healthcare decision makers, health system managers or policy makers
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Utilisation of research (Mexico) (for six obstetric practices: social support during labour, magnesium sulphate for eclampsia, corticosteroids to women with preterm birth, selective episiotomy, antibiotic use at caesarean section and vacuum extrac... · Healthcare decision makers, health system managers or policy makers
1 finding from 1 review

Carvedilol vs beta‐blocker

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding · adults with cirrhosis and gastroesophageal varices

It is very uncertain whether carvedilol changes upper gastrointestinal bleeding compared with traditional, non‐selective beta‐blockers (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Carvedilol vs beta‐blocker

Non‐serious adverse events · adults with cirrhosis and gastroesophageal varices

It is very uncertain whether carvedilol changes non‐serious adverse events compared with traditional, non‐selective beta‐blockers (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Carvedilol vs beta‐blocker

Haemodynamic treatment failure · adults with cirrhosis and gastroesophageal varices

It is very uncertain whether carvedilol changes haemodynamic treatment failure compared with traditional, non‐selective beta‐blockers (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Routine invasive strategies vs selective invasive strategies (conservative)

Death · participants with UA/NSTEMI in the stent era

Routine invasive strategies showed no clear difference in death compared with selective invasive strategies (conservative) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Routine invasive strategies vs selective invasive strategies (conservative)

Myocardial infarction · participants with UA/NSTEMI in the stent era

Routine invasive strategies showed no clear difference in myocardial infarction compared with selective invasive strategies (conservative) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review