Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured · participants with cholestatic pruritus (CP)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Depression ‐ not measured · participants with cholestatic pruritus (CP)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Risk for at least one adverse event per patient · participants with cholestatic pruritus (CP)
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Rifampin/rifampicin changes risk for at least one adverse event per patient compared with placebo (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pruritus: significant improvement · participants with cholestatic pruritus (CP)
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Flumecinol changes pruritus: significant improvement compared with placebo (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pruritus · participants with cholestatic pruritus (CP)
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life · participants with cholestatic pruritus (CP)
1 finding from 1 review
Patient satisfaction ‐ not measured · participants with cholestatic pruritus (CP)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Pruritus · patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) pruritus
1 finding from 1 review
Depression ‐ not measured · participants with cholestatic pruritus (CP)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Risk for at least one adverse event per participant ‐ not measured · participants with cholestatic pruritus (CP)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Quality of life ‐ not reported · patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) pruritus
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Patient satisfaction ‐ not reported · patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) pruritus
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Depression ‐ not reported · patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) pruritus
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Health‐related quality of life (HRQOL), SD units: measured on FACIT‐Pal, TOI of FACT‐Hep, TOI of FACT‐L, FACT‐G, McGill Quality of Life, FACIT‐Sp. Higher scores indicate better HRQOL. · patients with advanced cancer
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Health‐related quality of life (HRQOL), natural units: measured on FACT‐G (from 0 to 108) · patients with advanced cancer
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Survival: estimated with the unadjusted death hazard ratio · patients with advanced cancer
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes survival: estimated with the unadjusted death hazard ratio (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Depression, SD units: measured on CES‐D, HADS‐D, PHQ‐9. Higher scores indicate higher depressive symptom load. · patients with advanced cancer
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Depression, natural units: measured on CES‐D (from 0 to 60). Higher scores indicate higher depressive symptom load · patients with advanced cancer
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Symptom intensity, SD units: measured on ESAS, QUAL‐E Symptom Impact Subscale, SDS, RSC, LCS of FACT‐L, HCS of FACT‐Hep. Higher scores indicate higher symptom intensity. · patients with advanced cancer
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Symptom intensity, natural units: measured on ESAS (from 0 to 900). · patients with advanced cancer
1 finding from 1 review