Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

240 questions · 247 findings · 23 reviews

No studies found 35 · 14.2%GRADE not reported 13 · 5.3%Very low 50 · 20.2%Low 71 · 28.7%Moderate 65 · 26.3%High 13 · 5.3%

Pegloticase every two weeks (biweekly) vs placebo

Proportion with complete resolution of a target tophus · participants with tophi in gout

Pegloticase every two weeks (biweekly) probably leads to higher proportion with complete resolution of tophi compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pegloticase every two weeks (biweekly) vs placebo

Withdrawals due to adverse events · participants with tophi in gout

Pegloticase every two weeks (biweekly) probably leads to higher number of participant withdrawals due to adverse events compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF; pegfilgrastim, single dose) vs Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim, multiple doses)

Oral mucositis (any severity) · Children receiving bone marrow/stem cell transplantation after conditioning therapy for mixed cancers

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF; pegfilgrastim, single… showed no clear difference in oral mucositis (any severity) compared with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim, multiple…; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF; pegfilgrastim, single dose) vs Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim, multiple doses)

Normalcy of diet (total parenteral nutrition) · Children receiving bone marrow/stem cell transplantation after conditioning therapy for mixed cancers

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF; pegfilgrastim, single… showed no clear difference in normalcy of diet (total parenteral nutrition) compared with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim, multiple…; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF; pegfilgrastim, single dose) vs Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim, multiple doses)

Oral mucositis (moderate to severe) · Children receiving bone marrow/stem cell transplantation after conditioning therapy for mixed cancers

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF; pegfilgrastim, single… showed no clear difference in oral mucositis (moderate to severe) compared with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim, multiple…; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings 3: Efficacy and safety of IVT pegcetacoplan 4‐weekly (monthly) vs sham

Safety: Development of macular neovascularisation or exudative AMD at 1 year · adults with GA due to AMD

Summary of findings 3: Efficacy and safety of IVT pegcetacoplan… showed no clear difference in safety: Development of macular neovascularisation or exudative AMD… compared with sham; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings 3: Efficacy and safety of IVT pegcetacoplan 4‐weekly (monthly) vs sham

Safety: Development of endophthalmitis at 1 year · adults with GA due to AMD

Summary of findings 3: Efficacy and safety of IVT pegcetacoplan… showed no clear difference in safety: Development of endophthalmitis at 1 year compared with sham (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review