Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

164 questions · 214 findings · 22 reviews

No studies found 3 · 1.4%GRADE not reported 161 · 75.2%Very low 25 · 11.7%Low 15 · 7%Moderate 8 · 3.7%High 2 · 0.9%

Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) graft vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)

Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Mature permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis and carious pulp exposure (treated with full pulpotomy)

Platelet-rich fibrin and calcium hydroxide showed no significant difference in success (ungraded; effect size not reported).

1 finding from 1 review

Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs Pulpectomy

Tooth survival · Children with carious vital pulp exposure in primary incisors

Tooth survival was reported narratively in two trials and was not pooled.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs Pulpectomy

Pathological periapical radiolucency · Children with carious vital pulp exposure in primary incisors

Two trials reported periapical radiolucency but results were not pooled owing to considerable heterogeneity.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs Pulpectomy

Clinical failure · Children with carious vital pulp exposure in primary incisors

Pulpotomy may not differ from pulpectomy for clinical failure; no GRADE rating was reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs Pulpectomy

Soft tissue pathology · Children with carious vital pulp exposure in primary incisors

No statistically significant difference in soft tissue pathology between pulpotomy and pulpectomy (RR 3.11, 95% CI 0.54 to 17.7; ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs Pulpectomy

Pathological mobility · Children with carious vital pulp exposure in primary incisors

Pathological mobility was rare (one tooth in one of four trials) and was not pooled.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs Pulpectomy

Pathological root resorption · Children with carious vital pulp exposure in primary incisors

No statistically significant difference in pathological root resorption between pulpotomy and pulpectomy (RR 1.5, 95% CI 0.56 to 4.04; ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs Pulpectomy

Radiographic failure · Children with carious vital pulp exposure in primary incisors

No statistically significant difference in radiographic failure between pulpotomy and pulpectomy in the main analysis (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.42), with considerable heterogeneity (I2=76%; ungraded).

2 findings from 1 review

Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs Pulpectomy

Pain · Children with carious vital pulp exposure in primary incisors

No statistically significant difference in pain between pulpotomy and pulpectomy (RR 2.06, 95% CI 0.31 to 13.8; ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs Pulpectomy

Pulp canal obliteration · Children with carious vital pulp exposure in primary incisors

Pulp canal obliteration was reported narratively (mainly in the pulpotomy group) and was not pooled.

1 finding from 1 review

Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)

Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth undergoing pulpotomy

The effect of MTA versus CH after pulpotomy is uncertain (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) graft vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)

Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in immature permanent teeth undergoing pulpotomy

The two trials of PRF versus MTA for success gave contradictory results and were not pooled (ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)

Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth undergoing pulpotomy

MTA and CEM performed comparably for clinical and radiographic success (2 RCTs, not pooled; ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)

Dentin bridge formation · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth undergoing partial pulpotomy

Evidence on dentin bridge formation for calcium hydroxide versus MTA is weak and imprecise, with no material shown superior (4 RCTs, not pooled; ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)

Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in immature permanent teeth

In immature teeth, the effect of MTA versus calcium hydroxide on success is very uncertain (OR 2.22, 95% CI 0.13-36.67; very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)

Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth undergoing direct pulp capping

For direct pulp capping, MTA probably achieves higher clinical and radiographic success than calcium hydroxide (OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.66-5.79; moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)

Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth of mixed/unspecified root maturation

In mixed-maturation teeth, the effect of MTA versus calcium hydroxide on success is very uncertain (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.17-7.11; very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review