Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

175 questions · 179 findings · 20 reviews

No studies found 14 · 7.8%GRADE not reported 1 · 0.6%Very low 29 · 16.2%Low 81 · 45.3%Moderate 41 · 22.9%High 13 · 7.3%

Intervention not reported

Beta‐blockers plus sclerotherapy(4 RCTs; 231 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding

The intervention probably leads to lower beta‐blockers plus sclerotherapy(4 RCTs; 231 participants) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Beta‐blockers plus Sclerotherapy(8 RCTs; 370 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding

The intervention showed no clear difference in beta‐blockers plus Sclerotherapy(8 RCTs; 370 participants) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Carvedilol vs beta‐blocker

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding · adults with cirrhosis and gastroesophageal varices

It is very uncertain whether carvedilol changes upper gastrointestinal bleeding compared with traditional, non‐selective beta‐blockers (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Carvedilol vs beta‐blocker

Non‐serious adverse events · adults with cirrhosis and gastroesophageal varices

It is very uncertain whether carvedilol changes non‐serious adverse events compared with traditional, non‐selective beta‐blockers (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Carvedilol vs beta‐blocker

Haemodynamic treatment failure · adults with cirrhosis and gastroesophageal varices

It is very uncertain whether carvedilol changes haemodynamic treatment failure compared with traditional, non‐selective beta‐blockers (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review