Quality of care · children under 5 years of age
1 finding from 1 review
Satisfaction of beneficiaries · children under 5 years of age
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Caries affecting the (distal) adjacent second molar · Adults (416 healthy male volunteers aged 24 to 84 years) with asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth
It is very uncertain whether absence (previous removal or agenesis) of asymptomatic disease-free… changes caries affecting the (distal) adjacent second molar compared with presence (retention) of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom… (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Periodontitis (distal alveolar bone loss, adjacent second molar) · Adults (416 healthy male volunteers aged 24 to 84 years) with asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth
It is very uncertain whether absence (previous removal or agenesis) of asymptomatic disease-free… changes periodontitis (distal alveolar bone loss, adjacent second molar) compared with presence (retention) of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom… (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Periodontitis (distal probing depth greater than 4 mm, adjacent second molar) · Adults (416 healthy male volunteers aged 24 to 84 years) with asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth
It is very uncertain whether absence (previous removal or agenesis) of asymptomatic disease-free… changes periodontitis (distal probing depth greater than 4 mm, adjacent… compared with presence (retention) of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom… (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age · children under 5 years of age
Health education may leads to higher proportion of children who received DTP3/Penta 3 by 1 year of age compared with routine care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age · children under 5 years of age
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age · children under 5 years of age
Digital register showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age compared with routine care (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age · children under 5 years of age
Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age… compared with routine care (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age · children under 5 years of age
Wearable reminders showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age compared with routine care (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age · children under 5 years of age
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age · children under 5 years of age
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age · children under 5 years of age
It is very uncertain whether immunisation outreach changes proportion of children who received DTP3/Penta 3 by 1 year of age compared with routine care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age · children under 5 years of age
Integration of immunisation with other health services may leads to higher proportion of children who received DTP3/Penta 3 by 1 year of age compared with routine care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
WPPSI‐III FSIQ at 3.5 to 4 years of age Composite scores have a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Average is 90 to 109. · neonates born preterm with low birth weight
The intervention may leads to higher WPPSI‐III FSIQ at 3.5 to 4 years of age Composite scores have a mean… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Home visit with encouragement to receive influenza vaccination compared to home visit with safety intervention · people aged 60 years and older living in the community
Enhancing vaccination access showed no clear difference in home visit with encouragement to receive influenza vaccination… compared with no intervention or another intervention (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Home visit by nurse or group sessions with encouragement to receive influenza vaccination plus care plan developed with physician compared to no intervention · people aged 60 years and older living in the community
1 finding from 1 review
Posters in clinic displaying influenza vaccination rates to encourage doctors to compete plus postcards to participants compared to no intervention · people aged 60 years and older living in the community
Provider‐ or system‐based interventions leads to higher posters in clinic displaying influenza vaccination rates to… compared with no intervention or another intervention (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Posters in clinic displaying influenza vaccination rates to encourage doctors to compete plus postcards to participants compared to posters alone · people aged 60 years and older living in the community
Provider‐ or system‐based interventions showed no clear difference in posters in clinic displaying influenza vaccination rates to… compared with no intervention or another intervention (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Facilitator encouragement of prevention manoeuvres including influenza vaccination compared to no intervention · people aged 60 years and older living in the community
1 finding from 1 review