Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,550 questions · 1,617 findings · 161 reviews · Neonatal

No studies found 238 · 14.7%GRADE not reported 76 · 4.7%Very low 377 · 23.3%Low 567 · 35.1%Moderate 285 · 17.6%High 74 · 4.6%

Co‐bedding vs separate care

Apnea, bradycardia, or desaturation Number of twins with episodes · patients with promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins

Co‐bedding showed no clear difference in apnea, bradycardia, or desaturation Number of twins with episodes compared with separate care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Co‐bedding vs separate care

Infections ‐ Suspected or proven infections (any) Clinical and microbiological methods · patients with promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins

It is very uncertain whether co‐bedding changes infections ‐ suspected or proven infections (any) Clinical and… compared with separate care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation vs conventional ventilation

Overall mortality · preterm infants with severe pulmonary dysfunction

Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation showed no clear difference in overall mortality compared with conventional ventilation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation vs conventional ventilation

Mortality before cross‐over · preterm infants with severe pulmonary dysfunction

Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation probably leads to lower mortality before cross‐over compared with conventional ventilation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation vs conventional ventilation

Chronic lung disease · preterm infants with severe pulmonary dysfunction

Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation showed no clear difference in chronic lung disease at 28 days of birth (CLD 28 days) compared with conventional ventilation (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation vs conventional ventilation

Pulmonary air leak (new) · preterm infants with severe pulmonary dysfunction

Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation showed no clear difference in pulmonary air leak (new) compared with conventional ventilation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation vs conventional ventilation

Severe intraventricular haemorrhage · preterm infants with severe pulmonary dysfunction

Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation showed no clear difference in severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grades 3 and 4) compared with conventional ventilation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review