Cochrane · systematic review · CD000437
Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation versus conventional ventilation for severe pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants
Rojas‐Reyes, MX, Orrego‐Rojas, PA · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2015 · Cochrane Library
NeonatalAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
2
Included studies
NR
No studies 2 · 28.6%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 4 · 57.1%Moderate 1 · 14.3%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation versus conventional ventilation for severe pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants
Population: preterm infants with severe pulmonary dysfunction
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Overall mortality Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation vs conventional ventilation | RR 1.03 [0.64, 1.66] | 1 study · 144 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Mortality before cross‐over Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation vs conventional ventilation | RR 0.66 [0.45, 0.97] | 1 study · 144 participants | Moderate Downgraded: imprecision |
Chronic lung disease at 28 days of birth (CLD 28 days) Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation vs conventional ventilation | RR 0.77 [0.54, 1.07] | 1 study · 97 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Pulmonary air leak (new) Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation vs conventional ventilation | RR 0.76 [0.46, 1.23] | 1 study · 144 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grades 3 and 4) Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation vs conventional ventilation | RR 0.74 [0.42, 1.28] | 1 study · 118 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Chronic lung disease at 36 weeks postmenstrual age (CLD 36 wPMA) Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation vs conventional ventilation | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Long‐term neurodevelopmental outcomes Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation vs conventional ventilation | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |