Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,140 questions · 1,233 findings · 162 reviews

No studies found 326 · 26.4%GRADE not reported 193 · 15.7%Very low 290 · 23.5%Low 253 · 20.5%Moderate 153 · 12.4%High 18 · 1.5%

Intervention not reported

All cause withdrawal at · patients with coronary heart disease

The intervention showed no clear difference in all cause withdrawal at (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Visits to ED/hospital Over previous 12 months, measured at 1 and 2 yearsa · school staff
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Mortality · school staff
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Asthma control Quality of life (PAQLQ) · school staff
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Asthma control Narrative 1 year and 2 years · school staff
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Adherence to asthma policies 6 months to 1 year · school staff
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Absenteeism related to asthma Narrative · school staff
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Staff preparedness ‐ asthma knowledge NAKQ 0 to 31 scale; higher is better. 1 to 8 months · school staff
1 finding from 1 review

Monitoring (any means of observation, supervision, keeping under review, measuring or testing at intervals) vs No monitoring

Oral health: Not brushing teeth twice a day · People with serious mental illness (all included participants had schizophrenia); majority aged 18 to 65 years per NIMH 1987, or with…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Monitoring (any means of observation, supervision, keeping under review, measuring or testing at intervals) vs No monitoring

Oral health: Not having seen a dentist in the past year · People with serious mental illness (all included participants had schizophrenia); majority aged 18 to 65 years per NIMH 1987, or with…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Monitoring (any means of observation, supervision, keeping under review, measuring or testing at intervals) vs No monitoring

Quality of life: Chronic pain · People with serious mental illness (all included participants had schizophrenia); majority aged 18 to 65 years per NIMH 1987, or with…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Monitoring (any means of observation, supervision, keeping under review, measuring or testing at intervals) vs No monitoring

Service use: Emergency medical/dental treatment · People with serious mental illness (all included participants had schizophrenia); majority aged 18 to 65 years per NIMH 1987, or with…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Monitoring (any means of observation, supervision, keeping under review, measuring or testing at intervals) vs No monitoring

Adverse events: Clinically important specific adverse events · People with serious mental illness (all included participants had schizophrenia); majority aged 18 to 65 years per NIMH 1987, or with…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review