Caries increment in permanent teeth · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or less
1 finding from 1 review
Caries increment (dfs), deciduous teeth · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or less
1 finding from 1 review
Caries increment in deciduous teeth: d(e)fs (prevented fraction) · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or less
1 finding from 1 review
Caries increment on permanent tooth surfaces (D(M)FS), prevented fraction · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or younger (permanent dentition)
7 findings from 1 review
Show 4 more findings
PF 0.28 [0.19, 0.37]
22 studies
GRADE not reported
PF 0.40 [0.31, 0.49]
17 studies
GRADE not reported
PF 0.24 [0.21, 0.28]
70 studies
GRADE not reported
PF 0.46 [0.30, 0.63]
7 studies
GRADE not reported
Caries increment on primary (deciduous) tooth surfaces (d(e/m)fs), prevented fraction · Children with primary (deciduous) teeth (younger children)
5 findings from 1 review
PF 0.26 [-0.11, 0.63]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
PF 0.41 [0.26, 0.55]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
PF 0.27 [0.08, 0.48]
3 studies
GRADE not reported
Show 2 more findings
PF 0.33 [0.22, 0.44]
5 studies
GRADE not reported
PF 0.33 [0.19, 0.48]
3 studies
GRADE not reported
Caries increment on permanent whole teeth (D(M)FT), prevented fraction · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or younger (permanent dentition)
7 findings from 1 review
PF 0.26 [0.21, 0.30]
79 studies
GRADE not reported
PF 0.53 [0.23, 0.82]
3 studies
GRADE not reported
PF 0.32 [0.19, 0.46]
10 studies
GRADE not reported
Show 4 more findings
PF 0.45 [0.32, 0.58]
7 studies
GRADE not reported
PF 0.24 [0.18, 0.30]
13 studies
GRADE not reported
PF 0.24 [0.20, 0.28]
72 studies
GRADE not reported
PF 0.23 [0.19, 0.28]
53 studies
GRADE not reported
Caries increment on permanent tooth surfaces (D(M)FS), prevented fraction · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or less
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion developing new caries · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or less
Fluoride toothpaste showed no clear difference in proportion of children developing one or more new caries compared with placebo (non-fluoride) toothpaste; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Caries increment in deciduous teeth: df-rate, new decayed or filled teeth per 100 primary teeth (prevented fraction) · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or less
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse effects: dental fluorosis · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or less
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Caries increment on permanent whole teeth (D(M)FT), prevented fraction · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or less
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion developing new caries · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or younger (permanent dentition)
Topical fluoride therapy (toothpaste, mouthrinse, gel or varnish;… led to lower proportion of children developing one or more new caries compared with placebo or no treatment; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.88 [0.82, 0.95]
13 studies
GRADE not reported
Oral health-related quality of life · Children with dental caries
SDF had no significant effect on oral health-related quality of life versus pooled standard-of-care caries treatments (SMD -0.06, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.08; ungraded).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 7.47 [5.63, 9.93]
Studies not reported
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 6.51 [4.64, 9.13]
11 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 8.20 [6.93, 9.70]
7 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 6.16 [4.45, 8.52]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries
The intervention led to higher composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 2.98 [2.23, 3.98]
10 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 6.64 [4.83, 9.11]
Studies not reported
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 11.43 [7.88, 16.56]
2 studies
GRADE not reported