Question · asked by 1 review

Fluoride varnish combined with fluoride toothpaste vs Fluoride toothpaste alone: Caries increment in deciduous teeth: d(e)fs (prevented fraction)

Population
Children and adolescents aged 16 years or less
Intervention
Fluoride varnish combined with fluoride toothpaste
Comparison
Fluoride toothpaste alone
Outcome
Caries increment in deciduous teeth: d(e)fs (prevented fraction)

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Fluoride varnish combined with fluoride toothpaste vs Fluoride toothpaste alone
Caries increment in deciduous teeth: d(e)fs (prevented fraction) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or less · Nearest to 3 years
Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride… (2004) · Cochrane All outcomes
PF 0.151 study · 173 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride for preventing dental caries…
2004 · Cochrane All outcomes
2001-10Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.