Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

611 questions in 50 reviews · Injuries

current versions
No studies 125 · 20.5%Ungraded 22 · 3.6%Very low 185 · 30.3%Low 171 · 28%Moderate 77 · 12.6%High 31 · 5.1%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Anaerobic coverage only vs gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage
Abdominal surgical site infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma
Prophylactic antibiotics for penetrating abdominal trauma: duration of use and antibiotic choice (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.68, 1.52]4 studies · 523 participantsVery low
Anaerobic coverage only vs gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage
Mortality · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma
Prophylactic antibiotics for penetrating abdominal trauma: duration of use and antibiotic choice (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 417 participantsVery low
Anaerobic coverage only vs gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage
Intra‐abdominal infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma
Prophylactic antibiotics for penetrating abdominal trauma: duration of use and antibiotic choice (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.17 [0.59, 2.32]3 studies · 437 participantsVery low
Gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage vs gram‐positive, gram‐negative, and anaerobic coverage
Abdominal surgical site infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma
Prophylactic antibiotics for penetrating abdominal trauma: duration of use and antibiotic choice (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.4 [0.55, 3.56]6 studies · 516 participantsVery low
Gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage vs gram‐positive, gram‐negative, and anaerobic coverage
Mortality · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma
Prophylactic antibiotics for penetrating abdominal trauma: duration of use and antibiotic choice (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 177 participantsVery low
Gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage vs gram‐positive, gram‐negative, and anaerobic coverage
Intra‐abdominal infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma
Prophylactic antibiotics for penetrating abdominal trauma: duration of use and antibiotic choice (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.19 [0.43, 3.28]5 studies · 430 participantsVery low
Gram‐positive and gram‐negative coverage vs gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage
Abdominal surgical site infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma
Prophylactic antibiotics for penetrating abdominal trauma: duration of use and antibiotic choice (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.1 [0.65, 1.88]3 studies · 555 participantsVery low
More than 24 hours of antibiotics vs 24 hours of antibiotics
Mortality · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma
Prophylactic antibiotics for penetrating abdominal trauma: duration of use and antibiotic choice (2019) · Cochrane
OR 1.67 [0.73, 3.82]7 studies · 1261 participantsVery low
Gram‐positive and gram‐negative coverage vs gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage
Mortality · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma
Prophylactic antibiotics for penetrating abdominal trauma: duration of use and antibiotic choice (2019) · Cochrane
OR 0.55 [0.11, 2.77]3 studies · 555 participantsVery low
Gram‐positive and gram‐negative coverage vs gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage
Intra‐abdominal infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma
Prophylactic antibiotics for penetrating abdominal trauma: duration of use and antibiotic choice (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.08 [0.59, 1.98]3 studies · 555 participantsVery low
More than 24 hours of antibiotics vs 24 hours of antibiotics
Intra‐abdominal infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma
Prophylactic antibiotics for penetrating abdominal trauma: duration of use and antibiotic choice (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.23 [0.84, 1.8]6 studies · 1111 participantsVery low
Single dose of antibiotics vs 24 hours of antibiotics
Abdominal surgical site infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma
Prophylactic antibiotics for penetrating abdominal trauma: duration of use and antibiotic choice (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.48 [0.87, 2.52]1 study · 360 participantsVery low
Single dose of antibiotics vs 24 hours of antibiotics
Mortality · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma
Prophylactic antibiotics for penetrating abdominal trauma: duration of use and antibiotic choice (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 360 participantsVery low
Single dose of antibiotics vs 24 hours of antibiotics
Intra‐abdominal infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma
Prophylactic antibiotics for penetrating abdominal trauma: duration of use and antibiotic choice (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.76 [0.25, 2.32]1 study · 360 participantsVery low
Anaerobic coverage only vs gram‐positive, gram‐negative, and anaerobic coverage
Abdominal surgical site infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma
Prophylactic antibiotics for penetrating abdominal trauma: duration of use and antibiotic choice (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.46 [0.79, 2.71]4 studies · 395 participantsVery low
Anaerobic coverage only vs gram‐positive, gram‐negative, and anaerobic coverage
Mortality · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma
Prophylactic antibiotics for penetrating abdominal trauma: duration of use and antibiotic choice (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 309 participantsVery low
Anaerobic coverage only vs gram‐positive, gram‐negative, and anaerobic coverage
Intra‐abdominal infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma
Prophylactic antibiotics for penetrating abdominal trauma: duration of use and antibiotic choice (2019) · Cochrane
RR 2.46 [0.66, 9.14]3 studies · 309 participantsVery low
Iron therapy vs placebo, no treatment or standard care
Proportion of participants who received a blood transfusion · people with preoperative anaemia awaiting major surgery
Iron therapy for preoperative anaemia (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.21 [0.87, 1.7]4 studies · 200 participantsLow
Intravenous iron therapy vs oral iron therapy
Ferritin preoperatively postintervention (ng/L) · people with preoperative anaemia awaiting major surgery
Iron therapy for preoperative anaemia (2019) · Cochrane
MD 395.03 [227.72, 562.35]2 studies · 151 participantsLow
Iron therapy vs placebo, no treatment or standard care
Any validated measure of quality of life (measured by SF36) · people with preoperative anaemia awaiting major surgery
Iron therapy for preoperative anaemia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 72 participantsVery low
Iron therapy vs placebo, no treatment or standard care
Haemoglobin levels at end of preoperative treatment (g/dL) · people with preoperative anaemia awaiting major surgery
Iron therapy for preoperative anaemia (2019) · Cochrane
MD 0.632 studies · 83 participantsLow
Iron therapy vs placebo, no treatment or standard care
Haemoglobin levels post‐treatment and surgery (g/dL) · people with preoperative anaemia awaiting major surgery
Iron therapy for preoperative anaemia (2019) · Cochrane
MD 0.172 studies · 86 participantsLow
Iron therapy vs placebo, no treatment or standard care
Ferritin at the end of preoperative treatment (ng/mL) · people with preoperative anaemia awaiting major surgery
Iron therapy for preoperative anaemia (2019) · Cochrane
MD 149 [25.68, 272.32]1 study · 76 participantsLow
Intravenous iron therapy vs oral iron therapy
Proportion of participants who received a blood transfusion · people with preoperative anaemia awaiting major surgery
Iron therapy for preoperative anaemia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intravenous iron therapy vs oral iron therapy
Any validated measure of quality of life · people with preoperative anaemia awaiting major surgery
Iron therapy for preoperative anaemia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intravenous iron therapy vs oral iron therapy
Haemoglobin levels at end of preoperative treatment (g/dL) · people with preoperative anaemia awaiting major surgery
Iron therapy for preoperative anaemia (2019) · Cochrane
MD 1.23 [0.8, 1.65]2 studies · 172 participantsLow
Intravenous iron therapy vs oral iron therapy
Haemoglobin levels post‐treatment and surgery (g/dL) · people with preoperative anaemia awaiting major surgery
Iron therapy for preoperative anaemia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Intracranial pressure (mmHg) · adults presenting with elevated intracranial pressure secondary to a traumatic brain injury
Indomethacin for intracranial hypertension secondary to severe traumatic brain injury in adults (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Mortality one month after the start of therapy · adults presenting with elevated intracranial pressure secondary to a traumatic brain injury
Indomethacin for intracranial hypertension secondary to severe traumatic brain injury in adults (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Adverse effects considered as serious by either the patient or the clinician · adults presenting with elevated intracranial pressure secondary to a traumatic brain injury
Indomethacin for intracranial hypertension secondary to severe traumatic brain injury in adults (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Disability (measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale; higher score is better) · adults presenting with elevated intracranial pressure secondary to a traumatic brain injury
Indomethacin for intracranial hypertension secondary to severe traumatic brain injury in adults (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Differences in quality of life ( · adults presenting with elevated intracranial pressure secondary to a traumatic brain injury
Indomethacin for intracranial hypertension secondary to severe traumatic brain injury in adults (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intravenous iron vs placebo
Haemoglobin concentration taken at the end of · non‐anaemic, iron‐deficient adults
Intravenous iron therapy for non‐anaemic, iron‐deficient adults (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted8 studies · 548 participantsLow
Intravenous iron vs placebo
Overall quality of life measured at the end of · non‐anaemic, iron‐deficient adults
Intravenous iron therapy for non‐anaemic, iron‐deficient adults (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 344 participantsVery low
Intravenous iron vs placebo
Serum ferritin concentration measured at the end of · non‐anaemic, iron‐deficient adults
Intravenous iron therapy for non‐anaemic, iron‐deficient adults (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 studies · 376 participantsVery low
Intravenous iron vs placebo
Bacterial infection · non‐anaemic, iron‐deficient adults
Intravenous iron therapy for non‐anaemic, iron‐deficient adults (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intravenous iron vs placebo
Peak oxygen consumption taken at the end of · non‐anaemic, iron‐deficient adults
Intravenous iron therapy for non‐anaemic, iron‐deficient adults (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 32 participantsVery low
Intravenous iron vs placebo
Serious adverse events · non‐anaemic, iron‐deficient adults
Intravenous iron therapy for non‐anaemic, iron‐deficient adults (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intravenous iron vs placebo
Mild adverse effects · non‐anaemic, iron‐deficient adults
Intravenous iron therapy for non‐anaemic, iron‐deficient adults (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.19 [0.97, 1.45]3 studies · 440 participantsVery low
Starches vs crystalloid
All‐cause mortality (at end of
Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.97 [0.86, 1.09]24 studies · 11177 participantsModerate
Dextrans vs crystalloid
Renal replacement therapy
Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Dextrans vs crystalloid
Adverse events
Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Gelatins vs crystalloid
All‐cause mortality (at end of
Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.89 [0.74, 1.08]6 studies · 1698 participantsLow
Gelatins vs crystalloid
All‐cause mortality (within 90 days)
Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.89 [0.73, 1.09]1 study · 1388 participantsLow
Gelatins vs crystalloid
All‐cause mortality (within 30 days)
Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.92 [0.74, 1.16]1 study · 1388 participantsLow
Gelatins vs crystalloid
Transfusion of blood products
Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people (2018) · Cochrane
RR 5.89 [0.24, 142.41]1 study · 167 participantsVery low
Gelatins vs crystalloid
Renal replacement therapy
Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Gelatins vs crystalloid
Adverse events
Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRVery low
Albumin and fresh frozen plasma vs crystalloid
All‐cause mortality (at end of
Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.98 [0.92, 1.06]20 studies · 13047 participantsModerate
Albumin and fresh frozen plasma vs crystalloid
All‐cause mortality (within 90 days)
Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.98 [0.92, 1.04]10 studies · 12492 participantsModerate