Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

107 questions · 107 findings · 25 reviews · Eyes and Vision

No studies found 35 · 32.7%GRADE not reported 1 · 0.9%Very low 17 · 15.9%Low 25 · 23.4%Moderate 27 · 25.2%High 2 · 1.9%

Cataract surgery with Hydrus microstent vs cataract surgery alone

Proportion of participants who required further glaucoma surgery, including laser · people with cataracts and open angle glaucoma, many of whom had mild or moderate glaucoma, which was well‐controlled with medication

Cataract surgery with Hydrus microstent may leads to lower proportion of participants who required further glaucoma surgery,… compared with cataract surgery alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Cataract surgery with Hydrus microstent vs cataract surgery alone

Glaucoma progression at 12 months, measured by additional visual field defects · people with cataracts and open angle glaucoma, many of whom had mild or moderate glaucoma, which was well‐controlled with medication

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Cataract surgery with Hydrus microstent vs cataract surgery alone

Mean change in health‐related quality of life · people with cataracts and open angle glaucoma, many of whom had mild or moderate glaucoma, which was well‐controlled with medication

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Hydrus microstent vs iStent trabecular micro‐bypass stent

Mean change in unmedicated IOP (after washout) measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry short‐term · people with open angle glaucoma, many of whom had mild or moderate glaucoma, which was well‐controlled with medication
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Proportion of participants with IOP < 21 mmHg at 1 year' · participants with glaucoma or ocular hypertension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Mean IOP change from baseline at 1 year' · participants with glaucoma or ocular hypertension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Participant‐reported outcomes related to the ease, convenience, and comfort of instillation at 1 year' · participants with glaucoma or ocular hypertension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Physiologic measurements of systemic absorption at 1 year' · participants with glaucoma or ocular hypertension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Escalation of therapy at 1 year' · participants with glaucoma or ocular hypertension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Mean change in visual fields at 1 year' · participants with glaucoma or ocular hypertension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Adverse events at 1 year' · participants with glaucoma or ocular hypertension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review