Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

2,653 questions in 194 reviews · Gynaecology and Fertility

current versions
No studies 531 · 20%Ungraded 76 · 2.9%Very low 826 · 31.1%Low 855 · 32.2%Moderate 341 · 12.9%High 24 · 0.9%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Progesterone vs progesterone + oestrogen
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1.12 [0.91, 1.38]9 studies · 1651 participantsLow
Progesterone vs progesterone + oestrogen
Clinical pregnancy · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.86 [0.72, 1.04]14 studies · 2169 participantsLow
Progesterone vs progesterone + oestrogen
OHSS · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.58 [0.2, 1.68]2 studies · 461 participantsLow
Progesterone vs progesterone + GnRH agonist
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy · women who had undergone IVF/ICSI
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.62 [0.48, 0.81]9 studies · 2861 participantsVery low
Progesterone vs progesterone + GnRH agonist
Clinical pregnancy · women who had undergone IVF/ICSI
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.66 [0.51, 0.85]8 studies · 2435 participantsLow
Progesterone vs progesterone + GnRH agonist
OHSS · women who had undergone IVF/ICSI
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1 [0.33, 3.01]1 study · 300 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy IM vs oral · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.71 [0.14, 3.66]1 study · 40 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy IM vs vaginal/rectal · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1.24 [1.03, 1.5]7 studies · 2309 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy Vaginal/rectal vs oral · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1.19 [0.83, 1.69]4 studies · 857 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy Low dose vaginal vs high dose vaginal · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.97 [0.84, 1.11]5 studies · 3720 participantsModerate
hCG vs placebo/no treatment
Clinical pregnancy · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1.3 [0.9, 1.88]5 studies · 746 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy Short protocol vs long protocol · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1.04 [0.79, 1.36]5 studies · 1205 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy Micronised vs synthetic · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.9 [0.53, 1.55]2 studies · 470 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy Vaginal ring vs vaginal gel · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1.09 [0.88, 1.36]1 study · 1271 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy Subcutaneous vs vaginal gel · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.92 [0.74, 1.14]2 studies · 1465 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy Vaginal vs rectal · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1.28 [0.64, 2.54]1 study · 147 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
OHSS IM vs oral · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1 [0.06, 17.18]1 study · 40 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
OHSS Low dose vaginal vs high dose vaginal · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.91 [0.57, 1.46]2 studies · 1251 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Live birth/ongoing pregnancy ‐ short vs long protocol · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1.08 [0.81, 1.43]1 study · 910 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Live birth/ongoing pregnancy ‐ low vs high dose protocol · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.65 [0.37, 1.13]1 study · 285 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
OHSS ‐ short vs long protocol · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
hCG vs placebo/no treatment
OHSS · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 4.28 [1.91, 9.6]1 study · 387 participantsLow
Intervention NR
OHSS ‐ low vs high dose protocol · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Progesterone vs placebo/no treatment
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1.77 [1.09, 2.86]5 studies · 642 participantsVery low
Progesterone vs placebo/no treatment
Clinical pregnancy · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1.89 [1.3, 2.75]7 studies · 841 participantsLow
Progesterone vs placebo/no treatment
OHSS · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Progesterone vs hCG regimens
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.95 [0.65, 1.38]5 studies · 833 participantsLow
Progesterone vs hCG regimens
Clinical pregnancy · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1.08 [0.9, 1.3]16 studies · 2355 participantsModerate
Progesterone vs hCG regimens
OHSS · subfertile women
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.46 [0.3, 0.71]5 studies · 1293 participantsLow
Long‐acting FSH (all doses) vs daily FSH
Live birth rate ‐ Low dose (60 to 120 μg)
Long‐acting FSH versus daily FSH for women undergoing assisted reproduction (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.7 [0.52, 0.93]3 studies · 645 participantsModerate
Long‐acting FSH (all doses) vs daily FSH
Live birth rate ‐ Medium dose (150 to 180 μg)
Long‐acting FSH versus daily FSH for women undergoing assisted reproduction (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.03 [0.9, 1.18]4 studies · 1685 participantsModerate
Long‐acting FSH (all doses) vs daily FSH
Live birth rate ‐ High dose (240 μg)
Long‐acting FSH versus daily FSH for women undergoing assisted reproduction (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.43 [0.12, 1.52]1 study · 33 participantsVery low
Long‐acting FSH (all doses) vs daily FSH
OHSS ‐ Low dose (60 to 120 μg)
Long‐acting FSH versus daily FSH for women undergoing assisted reproduction (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.22 [0.56, 2.66]3 studies · 645 participantsModerate
Long‐acting FSH (all doses) vs daily FSH
OHSS ‐ Medium dose (150 to 180 μg)
Long‐acting FSH versus daily FSH for women undergoing assisted reproduction (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.96 [0.68, 1.35]5 studies · 3075 participantsLow
Long‐acting FSH (all doses) vs daily FSH
OHSS ‐ High dose (240 μg)
Long‐acting FSH versus daily FSH for women undergoing assisted reproduction (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.73 [0.09, 32.75]1 study · 33 participantsVery low
DHEA or testosterone vs placebo/no treatment
Live birth/ongoing pregnancy rate ‐ DHEA · Women undergoing assisted reproduction
Androgens (dehydroepiandrosterone or testosterone) for women undergoing assisted reproduction (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1.81 [1.25, 2.62]8 studies · 878 participantsModerate
Testosterone vs other active interventions
Live birth ‐ Testosterone vs estradiol + OCP · Women undergoing assisted reproduction
Androgens (dehydroepiandrosterone or testosterone) for women undergoing assisted reproduction (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1.67 [0.34, 8.1]1 study · 42 participantsVery low
Testosterone vs other active interventions
Miscarriage ‐ Testosterone vs estradiol · Women undergoing assisted reproduction
Androgens (dehydroepiandrosterone or testosterone) for women undergoing assisted reproduction (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.7 [0.11, 4.64]1 study · 46 participantsVery low
Testosterone vs other active interventions
Miscarriage ‐ Testosterone vs estradiol + OCP · Women undergoing assisted reproduction
Androgens (dehydroepiandrosterone or testosterone) for women undergoing assisted reproduction (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1.9 [0.16, 22.72]1 study · 42 participantsVery low
Testosterone vs other active interventions
Clinical pregnancy rate ‐ Testosterone vs estradiol · Women undergoing assisted reproduction
Androgens (dehydroepiandrosterone or testosterone) for women undergoing assisted reproduction (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1.4 [0.39, 5.07]1 study · 46 participantsVery low
Testosterone vs other active interventions
Clinical pregnancy rate ‐ Testosterone vs estradiol + OCP · Women undergoing assisted reproduction
Androgens (dehydroepiandrosterone or testosterone) for women undergoing assisted reproduction (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1.87 [0.45, 7.69]1 study · 42 participantsVery low
DHEA or testosterone vs placebo/no treatment
Live birth/ongoing pregnancy rate ‐ Testosterone · Women undergoing assisted reproduction
Androgens (dehydroepiandrosterone or testosterone) for women undergoing assisted reproduction (2015) · Cochrane
OR 2.6 [1.3, 5.2]4 studies · 345 participantsModerate
DHEA or testosterone vs placebo/no treatment
Miscarriage rate ‐ DHEA · Women undergoing assisted reproduction
Androgens (dehydroepiandrosterone or testosterone) for women undergoing assisted reproduction (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.58 [0.29, 1.17]8 studies · 950 participantsModerate
DHEA or testosterone vs placebo/no treatment
Miscarriage rate ‐ Testosterone · Women undergoing assisted reproduction
Androgens (dehydroepiandrosterone or testosterone) for women undergoing assisted reproduction (2015) · Cochrane
OR 2.04 [0.58, 7.13]4 studies · 345 participantsLow
DHEA or testosterone vs placebo/no treatment
Clinical pregnancy rate ‐ DHEA · Women undergoing assisted reproduction
Androgens (dehydroepiandrosterone or testosterone) for women undergoing assisted reproduction (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1.34 [1.01, 1.76]12 studies · 1246 participantsModerate
DHEA or testosterone vs placebo/no treatment
Clinical pregnancy rate ‐ Testosterone · Women undergoing assisted reproduction
Androgens (dehydroepiandrosterone or testosterone) for women undergoing assisted reproduction (2015) · Cochrane
OR 2.52 [1.36, 4.68]4 studies · 345 participantsModerate
DHEA or testosterone vs placebo/no treatment
Multiple pregnancy ‐ DHEA · Women undergoing assisted reproduction
Androgens (dehydroepiandrosterone or testosterone) for women undergoing assisted reproduction (2015) · Cochrane
OR 3.23 [0.13, 81.01]5 studies · 267 participantsVery low
DHEA or testosterone vs placebo/no treatment
Multiple pregnancy ‐ Testosterone · Women undergoing assisted reproduction
Androgens (dehydroepiandrosterone or testosterone) for women undergoing assisted reproduction (2015) · Cochrane
OR 3.09 [0.48, 19.98]3 studies · 292 participantsVery low
Testosterone vs other active interventions
Live birth ‐ Testosterone vs estradiol · Women undergoing assisted reproduction
Androgens (dehydroepiandrosterone or testosterone) for women undergoing assisted reproduction (2015) · Cochrane
OR 2.06 [0.43, 9.87]1 study · 46 participantsVery low
Radially expanding trocars vs cutting trocars
Visceral injury · people undergoing laparoscopy
Trocar types in laparoscopy (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.95 [0.06, 15.32]4 studies · 473 participantsVery low