Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

2,280 questions in 114 reviews · Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders

current versions
No studies 856 · 37.5%Ungraded 58 · 2.5%Very low 550 · 24.1%Low 502 · 22%Moderate 271 · 11.9%High 43 · 1.9%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Tinzaparin vs placebo
Pain intensityNumeric pain scale · people with sickle cell disease
Low‐molecular‐weight heparins for managing vaso‐occlusive crises in people with sickle cell disease (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 253 participantsVery low
Dalteparin vs placebo
Pain intensityVAS 0‐10. Scale from: 0 to 10. · patients with people with sickle cell disease
Low‐molecular‐weight heparins for managing vaso‐occlusive crises in people with sickle cell disease (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 35 participantsVery low
Dalteparin vs placebo
Pain duration ‐ not measured · patients with people with sickle cell disease
Low‐molecular‐weight heparins for managing vaso‐occlusive crises in people with sickle cell disease (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Dalteparin vs placebo
The requirement for opiate treatment ‐ not measured · patients with people with sickle cell disease
Low‐molecular‐weight heparins for managing vaso‐occlusive crises in people with sickle cell disease (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Dalteparin vs placebo
Number of serious complications of SCD ‐ not measured · patients with people with sickle cell disease
Low‐molecular‐weight heparins for managing vaso‐occlusive crises in people with sickle cell disease (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Dalteparin vs placebo
Number of other sickle‐related events ‐ not measured · patients with people with sickle cell disease
Low‐molecular‐weight heparins for managing vaso‐occlusive crises in people with sickle cell disease (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Dalteparin vs placebo
Quality of life (e.g. absence from school, lost time at work, mobility) as assessed by any validated questionnaire either generic or SCD specific) ‐ not measured · patients with people with sickle cell disease
Low‐molecular‐weight heparins for managing vaso‐occlusive crises in people with sickle cell disease (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Dalteparin vs placebo
Hospitalisation (number and duration) ‐ not measured · patients with people with sickle cell disease
Low‐molecular‐weight heparins for managing vaso‐occlusive crises in people with sickle cell disease (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Dalteparin vs placebo
Participant satisfaction with the medication assessed by any appropriate and validated questionnaire (either generic or SCD specific) ‐ not measured · patients with people with sickle cell disease
Low‐molecular‐weight heparins for managing vaso‐occlusive crises in people with sickle cell disease (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Dalteparin vs placebo
Adverse events associated with the use of anticoagulants (e.g. bleeding) ‐ not measured · patients with people with sickle cell disease
Low‐molecular‐weight heparins for managing vaso‐occlusive crises in people with sickle cell disease (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Tinzaparin vs placebo
Pain durationScale from: 1 to 7. · people with sickle cell disease
Low‐molecular‐weight heparins for managing vaso‐occlusive crises in people with sickle cell disease (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 253 participantsVery low
Tinzaparin vs placebo
The requirement for opiate treatment · people with sickle cell disease
Low‐molecular‐weight heparins for managing vaso‐occlusive crises in people with sickle cell disease (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 253 participantsVery low
Tinzaparin vs placebo
Number of serious complications of SCD ‐ not measured · people with sickle cell disease
Low‐molecular‐weight heparins for managing vaso‐occlusive crises in people with sickle cell disease (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Tinzaparin vs placebo
Number of other sickle‐related events ‐ not measured · people with sickle cell disease
Low‐molecular‐weight heparins for managing vaso‐occlusive crises in people with sickle cell disease (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Tinzaparin vs placebo
Quality of life (e.g. absence from school, lost time at work, mobility) as assessed by any validated questionnaire either generic or SCD specific) ‐ not measured · people with sickle cell disease
Low‐molecular‐weight heparins for managing vaso‐occlusive crises in people with sickle cell disease (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Tinzaparin vs placebo
Hospitalisation (number and duration)Scale from: 0 to 12. · people with sickle cell disease
Low‐molecular‐weight heparins for managing vaso‐occlusive crises in people with sickle cell disease (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 253 participantsVery low
Tinzaparin vs placebo
Participant satisfaction with the medication assessed by any appropriate and validated questionnaire (either generic or SCD specific) ‐ not measured · people with sickle cell disease
Low‐molecular‐weight heparins for managing vaso‐occlusive crises in people with sickle cell disease (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Tinzaparin vs placebo
Adverse events associated with the use of anticoagulants (e.g. bleeding) · people with sickle cell disease
Low‐molecular‐weight heparins for managing vaso‐occlusive crises in people with sickle cell disease (2015) · Cochrane
RR 4.96 [0.24, 102.31]1 study · 253 participantsLow
Deferasirox vs deferoxamine
Mortality · patients with sickle cell disease and transfusional iron overload
Deferasirox for managing transfusional iron overload in people with sickle cell disease (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.26 [0.05, 30.41]1 study · 191 participantsVery low
Deferasirox vs deferoxamine
End‐organ damage (incidence of diabetes) · patients with sickle cell disease and transfusional iron overload
Deferasirox for managing transfusional iron overload in people with sickle cell disease (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.26 [0.05, 30.41]1 study · 191 participantsVery low
Deferasirox vs deferoxamine
LIC measured by SQUID biomagnetometer (mg Fe/g dw); overall population adjusted for transfusion category · patients with sickle cell disease and transfusional iron overload
Deferasirox for managing transfusional iron overload in people with sickle cell disease (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 173 participantsModerate
Deferasirox vs deferoxamine
Serum ferritin (µg/l) · patients with sickle cell disease and transfusional iron overload
Deferasirox for managing transfusional iron overload in people with sickle cell disease (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 283 participantsModerate
Deferasirox vs deferoxamine
AE: Change in creatinine from baseline (µmol/l) · patients with sickle cell disease and transfusional iron overload
Deferasirox for managing transfusional iron overload in people with sickle cell disease (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 195 participantsModerate
Deferasirox vs deferoxamine
Discontinuations · patients with sickle cell disease and transfusional iron overload
Deferasirox for managing transfusional iron overload in people with sickle cell disease (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.53 [0.31, 0.92]2 studies · 398 participantsLow
Deferasirox vs deferoxamine
Satisfaction · patients with sickle cell disease and transfusional iron overload
Deferasirox for managing transfusional iron overload in people with sickle cell disease (2014) · Cochrane
RR 3.13 [1.99, 4.93]1 study · 195 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Total ITI Success · persons with severe haemophilia A and factor inhibitory antibodies
Immune tolerance induction for treating inhibitors in people with congenital haemophilia A or B (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.07 [0.68, 1.68]1 study · 115 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
All bleeding events · persons with severe haemophilia A and factor inhibitory antibodies
Immune tolerance induction for treating inhibitors in people with congenital haemophilia A or B (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.36 [1.09, 1.71]1 study · 115 participantsLow
Intervention NR
CVAD infections · persons with severe haemophilia A and factor inhibitory antibodies
Immune tolerance induction for treating inhibitors in people with congenital haemophilia A or B (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.96 [0.6, 1.53]1 study · 99 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Severe allergic reaction · persons with severe haemophilia A and factor inhibitory antibodies
Immune tolerance induction for treating inhibitors in people with congenital haemophilia A or B (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Nephrotic symdrome · persons with severe haemophilia A and factor inhibitory antibodies
Immune tolerance induction for treating inhibitors in people with congenital haemophilia A or B (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies