What do systematic reviews say?

Protocol to increase global blood flow vs control

Protocol to increase global blood flow showed no clear difference in mortality (Longest compared with control (low certainty).

• Perioperative increase in global blood flow to explicit defined goals and outcomes following surgery 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.89 [0.76, 1.05]
  31 studies · 5292 participants
  Low

Protocol to increase global blood flow vs control

Protocol to increase global blood flow showed no clear difference in mortality (Hospital or 28‐day) compared with control (low certainty).

• Perioperative increase in global blood flow to explicit defined goals and outcomes following surgery 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.81 [0.65, 1]
  31 studies · 5292 participants
  Low

Protocol to increase global blood flow vs control

Protocol to increase global blood flow may leads to lower number of patients with complications compared with control (low certainty).

• Perioperative increase in global blood flow to explicit defined goals and outcomes following surgery 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.68 [0.58, 0.8]
  17 studies · 1841 participants
  Low

Protocol to increase global blood flow vs control

• Perioperative increase in global blood flow to explicit defined goals and outcomes following surgery 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  27 studies · 4729 participants
  Low