Cochrane · systematic review · CD004082
Perioperative increase in global blood flow to explicit defined goals and outcomes following surgery
Grocott, MPW, Dushianthan, A, Hamilton, MA, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2012 · Cochrane Library
AnaesthesiaAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
4
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 4 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Protocol to increase global blood flow compared to control for surgical patients
Population: Surgical patients
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Mortality (Longest Protocol to increase global blood flow vs control | RR 0.89 [0.76, 1.05] | 31 studies · 5292 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Mortality (Hospital or 28‐day) Protocol to increase global blood flow vs control | RR 0.81 [0.65, 1] | 31 studies · 5292 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Number of patients with complications Protocol to increase global blood flow vs control | RR 0.68 [0.58, 0.8] | 17 studies · 1841 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Length of hospital stay Protocol to increase global blood flow vs control | no estimate extracted | 27 studies · 4729 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |