Question · asked by 1 review
Protocol to increase global blood flow vs control: Mortality within the longest
- Population
- surgical patients
- Intervention
- Protocol to increase global blood flow
- Comparison
- control
- Outcome
- Mortality within the longest
Protocol to increase global blood flow showed no clear difference in mortality (Longest compared with control (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol to increase global blood flow vs control Mortality (Longest · Surgical patients Protocol to increase global blood flow showed no clear difference in mortality (Longest compared with control (low certainty). Perioperative increase in global blood flow to explicit defined goals and outcomes following surgery (2012) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.89 [0.76, 1.05] | 31 studies · 5292 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perioperative increase in global blood flow to explicit defined goals and outcomes following surgery 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.