Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

1,361 questions · 1,518 findings · 352 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 73 · 4.8%GRADE not reported 211 · 13.9%Very low 500 · 32.9%Low 411 · 27.1%Moderate 252 · 16.6%High 71 · 4.7%

Acupuncture vs NSAIDs

Function (short‐term) Harris function score from: 0 to 47 (higher is better function). · patients with hip osteoarthritis

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture for hip osteoarthritis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 60 participants
Very low

Acupuncture as an addition to the routine primary care that trial participants were receiving from their physicians vs routine primary physician care alone

Pain (short term) WOMAC scale from 0 to 20 points (higher is worse pain). · patients with hip osteoarthritis

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture for hip osteoarthritis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 137 participants
Low

Acupuncture as an addition to the routine primary care that trial participants were receiving from their physicians vs routine primary physician care alone

Function (short‐term) WOMAC scale from: 0 to 100 (higher is worse function). · patients with hip osteoarthritis

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture for hip osteoarthritis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 137 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Quality of Life SF‐36 Physical Summary score (scale 0 to 100, higher score indicates better quality of life) · adults with intermittent claudication

1 finding from 1 review

Exercise for intermittent claudication 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 429 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Quality of Life SF‐36 Mental Summary score (scale 0 to 100, higher score indicates better quality of life) · adults with intermittent claudication

1 finding from 1 review

Exercise for intermittent claudication 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 343 participants
Moderate

Multidiscipinary rehabilitation vs usual care

Back pain · Subacute low back pain

1 finding from 1 review

Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 336 participants
Moderate

Multidiscipinary rehabilitation vs usual care

Functional disability (Higher scores indicate higher levels of disability) · Subacute low back pain

1 finding from 1 review

Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 240 participants
Low

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation vs other treatment

Pain at the long term Higher scores indicated more intense pain · Subacute low back pain

1 finding from 1 review

Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 336 participants
Low

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation vs other treatment

Functional disability (Higher scores indicate higher levels of disability) · Subacute low back pain

1 finding from 1 review

Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 345 participants
Low

Immediate cataract surgery vs delayed cataract surgery

Mean postoperative best‐corrected visual acuity · people with cataract and age‐related macular degeneration

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for cataracts in people with age‐related macular degeneration 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 56 participants
Moderate

Immediate cataract surgery vs delayed cataract surgery

Vision‐related quality of life · people with cataract and age‐related macular degeneration

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for cataracts in people with age‐related macular degeneration 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 56 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Joint mobility Range of motion Scale from 0°‐135° (higher number reflects better outcome) · people with neurological conditions1

1 finding from 1 review

Stretch for the treatment and prevention of contractures 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
18 studies · 549 participants
High

Intervention not reported

Participation restrictions 100 mm return to usual work activities VAS (higher score reflects better outcome) · people with non‐neurological conditions1

1 finding from 1 review

Stretch for the treatment and prevention of contractures 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 129 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Activity limitations 18‐point upper limb scale (higher score reflects better outcome) · people with neurological conditions1

1 finding from 1 review

Stretch for the treatment and prevention of contractures 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
7 studies · 237 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Joint mobility Range of motion Scale from 0°‐90° (higher number reflects better outcome) · people with non‐neurological conditions1

1 finding from 1 review

Stretch for the treatment and prevention of contractures 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
18 studies · 865 participants
High

Intervention not reported

Quality of life 160‐point Burn Specific Health Scale‐Brief questionnaire (higher score reflects better outcome) · people with non‐neurological conditions1

1 finding from 1 review

Stretch for the treatment and prevention of contractures 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 97 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings table ‐ Cognitive rehabilitation vs Conventional treatment

Functional independence · Treating patients with traumatic brain injury

It is very uncertain whether cognitive rehabilitation changes independence in ADL FIM, with 18 items in basic and psychosocial… compared with conventional treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Cognitive rehabilitation for adults with traumatic brain injury to improve occupational outcomes 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 41 participants
Very low

Summary of findings table ‐ Cognitive rehabilitation vs Conventional treatment

Community integration · Treating patients with traumatic brain injury

1 finding from 1 review

Cognitive rehabilitation for adults with traumatic brain injury to improve occupational outcomes 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 123 participants
Low

Summary of findings table ‐ Cognitive rehabilitation vs Conventional treatment

Quality of life Perceived Quality of Life scale. Scores range from 10 to 100, higher scores indicate better quality of life. · Treating patients with traumatic brain injury

1 finding from 1 review

Cognitive rehabilitation for adults with traumatic brain injury to improve occupational outcomes 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 68 participants
Moderate

Spasticity at up to 6 hours after treatment (measured by the Ashworth Scale, 0‐, with a higher score indicating greater spasticity) · adults with traumatic brain injury with spasticity in their arms and legs

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for managing skeletal muscle spasticity following traumatic brain injury 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 11 participants
Low