Cochrane · systematic review · CD002193
Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain
Marin, TJ, Van Eerd, D, Irvin, E, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library
Back and NeckAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
10
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
3
Included studies
NR
No studies 3 · 30%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 20%Low 4 · 40%Moderate 1 · 10%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Multidiscipinary rehabilitation versus usual care for subacute low back pain at long‐term follow‐up
Population: Subacute low back pain
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Back pain long‐term Higher scores indicated more intense pain Multidiscipinary rehabilitation vs usual care | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 336 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Functional disability at the long term Higher scores indicated more disability Multidiscipinary rehabilitation vs usual care | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 240 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Return‐to‐work at the long term Proportion at work Multidiscipinary rehabilitation vs usual care | OR 3.19 [1.46, 6.98] | 3 studies · 170 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
Sick leave periods at long‐term Cumulative sickness absence periods over the course of the 12‐month Multidiscipinary rehabilitation vs usual care | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 210 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
Adverse events Multidiscipinary rehabilitation vs usual care | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation versus other treatment for subacute low back pain at long‐term follow‐up
Population: Subacute low back pain
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Pain at the long term Higher scores indicated more intense pain Multidisciplinary rehabilitation vs other treatment | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 336 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Functional disability at the long term Higher scores indicated more severe functional disability. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation vs other treatment | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 345 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Return‐to‐work at long‐term Multidisciplinary rehabilitation vs other treatment | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Sick leave periods at long‐term Multidisciplinary rehabilitation vs other treatment | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 158 participants | Very low Downgraded: imprecision |
Adverse events Multidisciplinary rehabilitation vs other treatment | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |