Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,534 questions · 5,247 findings · 456 reviews

No studies found 1,142 · 21.8%GRADE not reported 1,503 · 28.6%Very low 1,040 · 19.8%Low 869 · 16.6%Moderate 554 · 10.6%High 139 · 2.6%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Monetary incentives vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (BCG) · children under 5 years of age

It is very uncertain whether monetary incentives changes proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (BCG) compared with routine care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Monetary incentives vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (measles/MMR) ‐ household monetary incentivef · children under 5 years of age

It is very uncertain whether monetary incentives changes proportion of children who received the vaccine under study… compared with routine care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Monetary incentives vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (MMR) ‐ service‐level monetary incentiveg · children under 5 years of age

It is very uncertain whether monetary incentives changes proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (MMR) ‐… compared with routine care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Monetary incentives vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (MMR) ‐ household + service‐level monetary incentive · children under 5 years of age

It is very uncertain whether monetary incentives changes proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (MMR) ‐… compared with routine care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Health education vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (BCG) · children under 5 years of age

Health education showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (BCG) compared with routine care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital register vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (OPV3) · children under 5 years of age

Digital register showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (OPV3) compared with routine care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital register vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (measles) · children under 5 years of age

Digital register showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (measles) compared with routine care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review