Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

1,361 questions · 1,518 findings · 352 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 73 · 4.8%GRADE not reported 211 · 13.9%Very low 500 · 32.9%Low 411 · 27.1%Moderate 252 · 16.6%High 71 · 4.7%

Summary of findings for AMBMT + PR vs PR

Health‐related quality of life (mental) · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

1 finding from 1 review

Active mind‐body movement therapies as an adjunct to or in comparison with pulmonary rehabilitation for people with… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 80 participants
Very low

Summary of findings: Trihexyphenidyl vs placebo

Change in dystonia from baseline Measured by: BADS (eight body regions assessed for dystonia on a five‐point scale (0 = none to 4 = severe), minimum score 0 to maximum score 32; higher score = greater severity of dystonia) · children with dystonic cerebral palsy

1 finding from 1 review

Trihexyphenidyl for dystonia in cerebral palsy 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
16 participants
Low

Summary of findings: Trihexyphenidyl vs placebo

Participation in activities of daily living:individual goal setting Measured by: GAS (up to 5 functional goals scored on a 5‐point scale (−2 = much less than expected to +2 = much more than expected); higher score = better than expected outcome) · children with dystonic cerebral palsy

1 finding from 1 review

Trihexyphenidyl for dystonia in cerebral palsy 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
16 participants
Low

Summary of findings: Trihexyphenidyl vs placebo

Participation in activities of daily living:performance of individual goals Measured by: performance subscale of the COPM (up to five problem areas scored on a 10‐point scale (1 = not able to do to 10 = able to do extremely well; higher score = be... · children with dystonic cerebral palsy

1 finding from 1 review

Trihexyphenidyl for dystonia in cerebral palsy 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
16 participants
Low

Decision aids for informed consent vs comparisons to improve professional performance

Patient satisfaction The degree of satisfaction · patient population with a specific condition or disease

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Patient‐mediated interventions to improve professional practice 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Patient‐reported health information interventions vs comparisons to improve professional performance

Patient satisfaction The degree of satisfaction · general patient population, "at risk" patient population and patient population with a specific condition or disease

1 finding from 1 review

Patient‐mediated interventions to improve professional practice 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 79 participants
Very low

Intervention diet vs usual on‐treatment diet

Mean GI symptom scores (IBDQ‐B) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 50 participants
Low

Intervention diet vs usual on‐treatment diet

QoL · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer

Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in QOL scores (IBDQ) (higher scores better) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
MD 4.6
1 study · 50 participants
Low

Intervention diet vs usual on‐treatment diet

Mean GI symptom scores (Vaizey scale) (higher scores better) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer

Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in mean GI symptom scores (Vaizey scale) (higher scores better) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 70 participants
Low

ICU follow‐up services vs standard care or no follow‐up service

Physical function · adult survivors of the ICU, excluding those already in an existing follow‐up or rehabilitation programme

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up services for improving long‐term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 422 participants
Very low

ICU follow‐up services vs standard care or no follow‐up service

Cognitive function · adult survivors of the ICU, excluding those already in an existing follow‐up or rehabilitation programme

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up services for improving long‐term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 622 participants
Very low

Mirtazapine vs placebo

Participant‐reported sleep problems (scale: 0 to 28; higher scores indicate more sleep problems) · adults with fibromyalgia

Mirtazapine showed no clear difference in participant‐reported sleep problems (scale: 0 to 28; higher scores… compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mirtazapine for fibromyalgia in adults 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 573 participants
Low

Acupuncture vs sham

Pain (short term) WOMAC scale from 0 to 20 points (higher is worse pain). · patients with hip osteoarthritis

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture for hip osteoarthritis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 105 participants
Moderate

Acupuncture as an addition to the routine primary care that trial participants were receiving from their physicians vs routine primary physician care alone

Quality of Life: SF‐36 (physical component) · patients with hip osteoarthritis

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture for hip osteoarthritis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 137 participants
Low

Acupuncture as an addition to the routine primary care that trial participants were receiving from their physicians vs routine primary physician care alone

Quality of life (mental component) (short‐term) SF‐36 physical component scale from 0 to 100 (higher is better quality of life). · patients with hip osteoarthritis

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture for hip osteoarthritis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 137 participants
Low

Acupuncture vs sham

Function (short‐term) WOMAC scale from: 0 to 100 (higher is worse function). · patients with hip osteoarthritis

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture for hip osteoarthritis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 105 participants
Moderate

Acupuncture as an addition to patient education vs education alone

Pain (short term) WOMAC scale from 0 to 20 points (higher is worse pain). · patients with hip osteoarthritis

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture for hip osteoarthritis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 25 participants
GRADE not reported

Acupuncture as an addition to patient education vs education alone

Function (short‐term) DRI scale from: 0 to 100 (higher is worse function). · patients with hip osteoarthritis

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture for hip osteoarthritis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 25 participants
GRADE not reported

Acupuncture as an addition to patient education vs education alone

Quality of life (short‐term) GSI scale from 0 to 10 (higher is worse quality of life). · patients with hip osteoarthritis

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture for hip osteoarthritis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 25 participants
GRADE not reported

Acupuncture vs NSAIDs

Pain (short term) WOMAC scale from 0 to 20 points (higher is worse pain). · patients with hip osteoarthritis

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture for hip osteoarthritis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 60 participants
Very low