evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

957 questions · 979 findings · 250 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 159 · 16.2%GRADE not reported 75 · 7.7%Very low 264 · 27%Low 303 · 30.9%Moderate 138 · 14.1%High 40 · 4.1%

Methotrexate vs placebo

Global well‐being: rated by participants · children and young people with JIA

Methotrexate showed no clear difference in participant global assessment of well‐being(up to 6 months) compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings for the main comparison: comprehensive care programmes vs usual care

Child and family satisfaction with, and perceptions of, care and service delivery Family Experiences With Coordination of Care (FECC) survey (higher scores = better) Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) (higher scores = ... · children with medical complexity
1 finding from 1 review

Face‐down positioning vs other positioning

Quality of life assessments at 3 months or later (higher is favored) · people with primary macula‐involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachments

It is very uncertain whether face‐down positioning changes quality of life assessments at 3 months or later (higher is favored) compared with other positioning (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Light vibrational forces (LVF) vs Conventional orthodontic appliance treatment

Improvement in occlusion (Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) or other validated scale) · Adolescents and adults with malocclusion undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed or removable appliances
1 finding from 1 review

Face‐down positioning vs no face‐down positioning or posturing after macular hole surgery

Closure of macular hole · participants with idiopathic macular hole

Face‐down positioning or posturing showed no clear difference in macular hole closure (anatomical assessment) compared with no face‐down positioning or posturing after macular hole surgery (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Breast cancer stage at the time of presentation: defined as the proportion of women with breast cancer diagnosed at early stage (stage 0, I, II) Time of outcome assessment: 3 years to 20 years Method of measurement: CBE · health workers

The intervention may leads to higher breast cancer stage at the time of presentation: defined as the… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Breast cancer stage at the time of presentation: defined as the proportion of women with breast cancer diagnosed at late stage (stage III, IV) Time of outcome assessment: 3 years to 20 years Method of measurement: CBE · health workers

The intervention may leads to lower breast cancer stage at the time of presentation: defined as the… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Breast cancer mortality: defined as deaths among women who received a diagnosis of breast cancer Time of outcome assessment: 3 years to 20 years Method of measurement: death registration offices, hospital records, and house visits · health workers

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes breast cancer mortality: defined as deaths among women who received… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Pain intensity measured on CHQ (0‐100; 0 = worse pain), and VAS (0 to 100; 0 = no pain) Postintervention: first assessment after end of treatment; no later than 3 months · children and adolescents aged 4 years to 18 years, with chronic musculoskeletal pain
1 finding from 1 review