Acceptability Proportion satisfied with treatment · heavy menstrual bleeding
Endometrial resection/ablation showed no clear difference in acceptability Proportion satisfied with treatment compared with unspecified (or at surgeon's discretion) route of hysterectomy (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Safety Any serious adverse event · heavy menstrual bleeding
Endometrial resection/ablation probably leads to lower safety Any serious adverse event compared with unspecified (or at surgeon's discretion) route of hysterectomy (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Return to normal activity · heavy menstrual bleeding
1 finding from 1 review
Effectiveness Proportion of women with perception of improvement of bleeding symptoms · HMB
Endometrial resection or ablation probably leads to lower effectiveness Woman's perception (proportion with improvement in… compared with open hysterectomy (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Acceptability Proportion satisfied with treatment · heavy menstrual bleeding
Endometrial resection or ablation probably leads to lower acceptability Proportion satisfied with treatment compared with minimally invasive hysterectomy (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Safety Any serious adverse event · heavy menstrual bleeding
Endometrial resection or ablation showed no clear difference in safety Any serious adverse event compared with minimally invasive hysterectomy (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Return to normal activity · heavy menstrual bleeding
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
99 participants
GRADE not reported
Quality of life SF‐36 at 2 years – general health perception · HMB
1 finding from 1 review
Requirement for further surgery for treatment failure within 1 year after surgery · HMB
1 finding from 1 review
Acceptability Proportion satisfied with treatment · HMB
Endometrial resection or ablation showed no clear difference in acceptability Proportion satisfied with treatment compared with open hysterectomy (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Safety Any serious adverse event · HMB
Endometrial resection or ablation showed no clear difference in safety Any serious adverse events compared with open hysterectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Return to normal activity · HMB
1 finding from 1 review
Effectiveness · heavy menstrual bleeding
Endometrial resection or ablation showed no clear difference in effectiveness compared with minimally invasive hysterectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life · heavy menstrual bleeding
1 finding from 1 review
Requirement for further surgery for treatment failure within 1 year after surgery · heavy menstrual bleeding
Endometrial resection or ablation probably leads to higher requirement for further surgery for treatment failure within 1 year… compared with minimally invasive hysterectomy (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Ulcer healing time (measured as days from randomisation and followed‐up to 1 year) · people with venous leg ulcers
Summary of findings: endovenous ablation and compression leads to higher ulcer healing time (measured as days from randomisation and… compared with compression alone (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
The proportion of pressure ulcers healed · people with venous leg ulcers
Summary of findings: endovenous ablation and compression showed no clear difference in proportion of ulcers healed at 90 days (90 days compared with compression alone (moderate certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Recurrence of ulcers · people with venous leg ulcers
Summary of findings: endovenous ablation and compression showed no clear difference in ulcer recurrence (1 year compared with compression alone (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Time to foot ulcer recurrence · people with venous leg ulcers
1 finding from 1 review
Overall pain scores (reduction in VAS at 12 months) · endometriosis
1 finding from 1 review