Cochrane · systematic review · CD009494

Endovenous ablation for venous leg ulcers

Cai, PL, Hitchman, LH, Mohamed, AH, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2023 · Cochrane Library

WoundsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
5
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 40%Moderate 2 · 40%High 1 · 20%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Summary of findings: endovenous ablation and compression vs compression alone for venous leg ulcers

Population: adults with venous leg ulcers.
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Ulcer healing time (measured as days from randomisation and followed‐up to 1 year)
Summary of findings: endovenous ablation and compression vs compression alone
HR 1.41 [1.36, 1.47]2 studies · 466 participantsHigh
Proportion of ulcers healed at 90 days (90 days
Summary of findings: endovenous ablation and compression vs compression alone
RR 1.14 [1, 1.3]2 studies · 466 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Proportion of ulcers healed at one year (52 week
Summary of findings: endovenous ablation and compression vs compression alone
RR 1.08 [1.02, 1.14]2 studies · 505 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Ulcer recurrence (1 year
Summary of findings: endovenous ablation and compression vs compression alone
RR 0.29 [0.03, 2.48]2 studies · 460 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Ulcer‐free time (measured as days from healing of index ulcer to recurrence)
Summary of findings: endovenous ablation and compression vs compression alone
no estimate extracted1 study · 450 participantsLow
Downgraded: indirectness