Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

973 questions · 1,024 findings · 106 reviews

No studies found 235 · 22.9%GRADE not reported 59 · 5.8%Very low 207 · 20.2%Low 271 · 26.5%Moderate 177 · 17.3%High 75 · 7.3%

Acyclovir vs placebo, vitamins, or no treatment

The proportion of participants with good or excellent rash improvement within 2 weeks, as rated by a medical practitioner · pityriasis rosea

Acyclovir probably leads to higher the proportion of participants with good or excellent rash… compared with placebo, vitamins, or no treatment (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Acyclovir vs placebo, vitamins, or no treatment

Minor adverse events not leading to withdrawal of treatment · pityriasis rosea

Acyclovir showed no clear difference in minor participant‐reported adverse events not requiring withdrawal… compared with placebo, vitamins, or no treatment (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral nutritional supplements vs multivitamin and mineral supplement

Complications · Partcipants with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy (male n = 314, female n = 87; age (interquartile range) 59 to 74)Country:…

Oral nutritional supplements showed no clear difference in complications compared with multivitamin and mineral supplement (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral nutritional supplements vs multivitamin and mineral supplement

All‐cause mortality · Partcipants with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy (male n = 314, female n = 87; age (interquartile range) 59 to 74)Country:…

Oral nutritional supplements showed no clear difference in mortality compared with multivitamin and mineral supplement (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist (VKA)

All‐cause mortality (up to 3 months) · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters

Low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (up to 3 months) compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist (VKA)

Symptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis (up to 3 months) · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters

It is very uncertain whether low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) changes symptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis (up to 3 months) compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist (VKA)

Symptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis measured as asymptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis (up to 3 months) · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters

It is very uncertain whether low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) changes symptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis measured as asymptomatic… compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist (VKA)

Major bleeding · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters

It is very uncertain whether low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) changes major bleeding (up to 3 months) compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist (VKA)

Minor bleeding · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters

It is very uncertain whether low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) changes minor bleeding (up to 3 months) compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review