Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,247 questions · 1,321 findings · 334 reviews

No studies found 73 · 5.5%GRADE not reported 31 · 2.3%Very low 500 · 37.9%Low 406 · 30.7%Moderate 247 · 18.7%High 64 · 4.8%

Summary of findings: Trihexyphenidyl vs placebo

Participation in activities of daily living:individual goal setting Measured by: GAS (up to 5 functional goals scored on a 5‐point scale (−2 = much less than expected to +2 = much more than expected); higher score = better than expected outcome) · children with dystonic cerebral palsy
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Trihexyphenidyl vs placebo

Participation in activities of daily living:performance of individual goals Measured by: performance subscale of the COPM (up to five problem areas scored on a 10‐point scale (1 = not able to do to 10 = able to do extremely well; higher score = be... · children with dystonic cerebral palsy
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention diet vs usual on‐treatment diet

QoL · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer

Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in QOL scores (IBDQ) (higher scores better) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention diet vs usual on‐treatment diet

Mean GI symptom scores (Vaizey scale) (higher scores better) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer

Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in mean GI symptom scores (Vaizey scale) (higher scores better) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mirtazapine vs placebo

Participant‐reported sleep problems (scale: 0 to 28; higher scores indicate more sleep problems) · adults with fibromyalgia

Mirtazapine showed no clear difference in participant‐reported sleep problems (scale: 0 to 28; higher scores… compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture vs sham

Pain (short term) WOMAC scale from 0 to 20 points (higher is worse pain). · patients with hip osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture vs sham

Function (short‐term) WOMAC scale from: 0 to 100 (higher is worse function). · patients with hip osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture vs NSAIDs

Pain (short term) WOMAC scale from 0 to 20 points (higher is worse pain). · patients with hip osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture vs NSAIDs

Function (short‐term) Harris function score from: 0 to 47 (higher is better function). · patients with hip osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review