Time to occurrence of new ulcer · individuals with spinal cord injury
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of participants developing a new ulcer · individuals with spinal cord injury
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of participants developing a new ulcer · s
It is very uncertain whether self‐instruction and one‐to‐one counselling changes proportion of participants developing a new ulcer (3 months) compared with self‐instruction (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Time to occurrence of new ulcer · s
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of participants developing a new ulcer · s
Pressure ulcer prevention care bundle showed no clear difference in proportion of participants developing a new ulcer (28 days) compared with standard care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Time to occurrence of new ulcer · s
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of participants developing a new ulcer · s
It is very uncertain whether carer self‐instruction and one‐to‐one counselling changes proportion of participants developing a new ulcer (12 months) compared with self‐instruction (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Time to occurrence of new ulcer · s
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of participants developing a new ulcer · s
It is very uncertain whether home‐based training changes proportion of participants developing a new ulcer (3 months) compared with usual care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Dry eye Cross‐over study (cluster‐RCT) after 6 weeks · Adults
The intervention may leads to lower dry eye Cross‐over study (cluster‐RCT) after 6 weeks (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.54 [0.37, 0.79]
211 participants
Low
Intervention not reported
Perception of stuffiness: Cross‐over study (cluster non‐RCT) after 6 weeks · Adults
The intervention may leads to higher perception of stuffiness: Cross‐over study (cluster non‐RCT) after 6… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.7 [1.1, 2.61]
368 participants
Low
Intervention not reported
Perception of stuffiness: 2 Before‐and‐after studies after 1‐4 months · Adults
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
102 participants
Very low
Intervention not reported
Absenteeism due to cold symptoms · Children
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes absenteeism due to cold symptoms (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Average days of absence per child · Children
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Average weekly absence · Children
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes average weekly absence (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Average total absenteeism · Children
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
12 participants
Very low
Intervention not reported
Absenteeism due to sickness · Children
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Absenteeism due to influenza‐like illness · Children
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Dry eye Cross‐over studies (cluster non‐RCT) after 6 – 12 weeks · Adults
The intervention showed no clear difference in dry eye Cross‐over studies (cluster non‐RCT) after 6 – 12 weeks (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.58 [0.27, 1.25]
407 participants
Low
Intervention not reported
Dry eye Before‐and‐after studies after 6 weeks ‐ 4 months · Adults
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes dry eye Before‐and‐after studies after 6 weeks ‐ 4 months (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.57 [0.23, 1.41]
102 participants
Very low