Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

2,206 questions in 117 reviews · Common Mental Disorders

current versions
No studies 387 · 17.5%Ungraded 111 · 5%Very low 635 · 28.8%Low 568 · 25.7%Moderate 449 · 20.4%High 56 · 2.5%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Paroxetine vs agomelatine
Failure to respond at endpoint (6‐12 weeks) · patients with depression
Paroxetine versus other anti‐depressive agents for depression (2014) · Cochrane
OR 1.25 [0.78, 2.01]1 study · 284 participantsModerate
Paroxetine vs milnacipran
Failure to respond at 16‐24 weeks · patients with depression
Paroxetine versus other anti‐depressive agents for depression (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Paroxetine vs milnacipran
Failure to remit at endpoint · patients with depression
Paroxetine versus other anti‐depressive agents for depression (2014) · Cochrane
OR 0.92 [0.57, 1.49]1 study · 302 participantsModerate
Paroxetine vs milnacipran
SMD at endpoint · patients with depression
Paroxetine versus other anti‐depressive agents for depression (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 299 participantsModerate
Paroxetine vs milnacipran
Failure to complete ‐ any cause ‐ · patients with depression
Paroxetine versus other anti‐depressive agents for depression (2014) · Cochrane
OR 1.17 [0.67, 2.3]2 studies · 343 participantsModerate
Paroxetine vs milnacipran
Participants with at least some Side Effects · patients with depression
Paroxetine versus other anti‐depressive agents for depression (2014) · Cochrane
OR 0.69 [0.41, 1.15]1 study · 302 participantsModerate
Paroxetine vs mirtazapine
Failure to respond at endpoint (6‐12 weeks) · patients with depression
Paroxetine versus other anti‐depressive agents for depression (2014) · Cochrane
OR 1.2 [0.9, 1.61]4 studies · 766 participantsModerate
Paroxetine vs mirtazapine
Failure to respond at 1‐4 weeks · patients with depression
Paroxetine versus other anti‐depressive agents for depression (2014) · Cochrane
OR 2.39 [1.42, 4.02]3 studies · 726 participantsModerate
Paroxetine vs mirtazapine
Failure to respond at 16‐24 weeks · patients with depression
Paroxetine versus other anti‐depressive agents for depression (2014) · Cochrane
OR 1.41 [0.81, 2.48]3 studies · 726 participantsModerate
Paroxetine vs mirtazapine
Failure to remit at endpoint · patients with depression
Paroxetine versus other anti‐depressive agents for depression (2014) · Cochrane
OR 1.52 [1.13, 2.06]4 studies · 766 participantsModerate
Paroxetine vs mirtazapine
SMD at endpoint · patients with depression
Paroxetine versus other anti‐depressive agents for depression (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 246 participantsModerate
Paroxetine vs agomelatine
Failure to respond at 1‐4 weeks · patients with depression
Paroxetine versus other anti‐depressive agents for depression (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Paroxetine vs mirtazapine
Failure to complete ‐ any cause ‐ · patients with depression
Paroxetine versus other anti‐depressive agents for depression (2014) · Cochrane
OR 1.26 [0.91, 1.74]3 studies · 726 participantsModerate
Paroxetine vs mirtazapine
Participants with at least some Side Effects · patients with depression
Paroxetine versus other anti‐depressive agents for depression (2014) · Cochrane
OR 1.07 [0.76, 1.5]3 studies · 726 participantsModerate
Paroxetine vs nefazodone
Failure to respond at endpoint (6‐12 weeks) · patients with depression
Paroxetine versus other anti‐depressive agents for depression (2014) · Cochrane
OR 0.31 [0.07, 1.25]1 study · 40 participantsModerate
Paroxetine vs nefazodone
Failure to respond at 1‐4 weeks · patients with depression
Paroxetine versus other anti‐depressive agents for depression (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Paroxetine vs nefazodone
Failure to respond at 16‐24 weeks · patients with depression
Paroxetine versus other anti‐depressive agents for depression (2014) · Cochrane
OR 0.64 [0.17, 2.38]1 study · 40 participantsModerate
Paroxetine vs nefazodone
Failure to remit at endpoint · patients with depression
Paroxetine versus other anti‐depressive agents for depression (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Paroxetine vs nefazodone
SMD at endpoint · patients with depression
Paroxetine versus other anti‐depressive agents for depression (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 235 participantsModerate
Paroxetine vs nefazodone
Failure to complete ‐ any cause ‐ · patients with depression
Paroxetine versus other anti‐depressive agents for depression (2014) · Cochrane
OR 0.53 [0.11, 2.6]1 study · 40 participantsModerate
Paroxetine vs nefazodone
Participants with at least some Side Effects · patients with depression
Paroxetine versus other anti‐depressive agents for depression (2014) · Cochrane
OR 0.69 [0.34, 1.4]1 study · 206 participantsModerate
Paroxetine vs reboxetine
Failure to respond at endpoint (6‐12 weeks) · patients with depression
Paroxetine versus other anti‐depressive agents for depression (2014) · Cochrane
OR 0.82 [0.66, 1.02]3 studies · 1369 participantsModerate
rTMS + pharmacotherapy vs sham rTMS + pharmacotherapy
Reduction of panic symptoms: Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS) (high=poor, data skewed) PDSS, Scale from: 0 to 28) · participants with panic disorder
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for panic disorder in adults (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
rTMS + pharmacotherapy vs sham rTMS + pharmacotherapy
Acceptability: dropouts for any reason number of dropouts · participants with panic disorder
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for panic disorder in adults (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 40 participantsVery low
rTMS + pharmacotherapy vs sham rTMS + pharmacotherapy
Acceptability: dropouts for adverse effects number of dropouts · participants with panic disorder
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for panic disorder in adults (2014) · Cochrane
RD 02 studies · 40 participantsVery low
rTMS + pharmacotherapy vs sham rTMS + pharmacotherapy
Improvment of social function: Self‐reported social adaptation scale (SASS) (low=poor), acute effect SASS. Scale from: 0 to 60. · participants with panic disorder
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for panic disorder in adults (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 21 participantsVery low
rTMS + pharmacotherapy vs sham rTMS + pharmacotherapy
Quality of life (such as the SF‐36 Health Survey (Ware 1992) · participants with panic disorder
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for panic disorder in adults (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
rTMS + pharmacotherapy vs sham rTMS + pharmacotherapy
Safety of rTMS: Frequency of rTMS side effects (values are percentages) self‐reported questionnaire · participants with panic disorder
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for panic disorder in adults (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Psychological intervention vs control
Reduction on a scale of psychological distress— · people of any age who have survived any type of torture
Psychological, social and welfare interventions for psychological health and well‐being of torture survivors (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 86 participantsVery low
Psychological intervention vs control
Adverse events · people of any age who have survived any type of torture
Psychological, social and welfare interventions for psychological health and well‐being of torture survivors (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Psychological intervention vs control
Reduction in post‐traumatic stress symptoms— · people of any age who have survived any type of torture
Psychological, social and welfare interventions for psychological health and well‐being of torture survivors (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 86 participantsVery low
Psychological intervention vs control
Improvement in quality of life— · people of any age who have survived any type of torture
Psychological, social and welfare interventions for psychological health and well‐being of torture survivors (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Psychological intervention vs control
Improvement in participation · people of any age who have survived any type of torture
Psychological, social and welfare interventions for psychological health and well‐being of torture survivors (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Psychological intervention vs control
Improvement in family or social relationships · people of any age who have survived any type of torture
Psychological, social and welfare interventions for psychological health and well‐being of torture survivors (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Psychological intervention vs control
Satisfaction with treatment · people of any age who have survived any type of torture
Psychological, social and welfare interventions for psychological health and well‐being of torture survivors (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Tricyclic antidepressants vs placebo
Severity/intensity of MUPS (post‐treatment score on self report scales) Different self report scales (SCL‐90‐R Somatisation Subscore, VAS) · somatoform disorders in adults
Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 239 participantsLow
New‐generation antidepressants vs placebo
Anxiety (post‐treatment score on self report and clinician‐rated scales) Clinician‐rated scales (HARS) · somatoform disorders in adults
Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 163 participantsVery low
New‐generation antidepressants vs placebo
Depression (post‐treatment score on self report and clinician‐rated scales) Different clinician‐rated scales (HDRS, MADRS) · somatoform disorders in adults
Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 163 participantsVery low
New‐generation antidepressants vs placebo
Adverse effects (drop‐outs due to adverse effects) · somatoform disorders in adults
Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults (2014) · Cochrane
RR 2.26 [0.52, 9.81]2 studies · 163 participantsLow
New‐generation antidepressants vs placebo
Treatment response (post‐treatment score on self report and clinician‐rated scales) Different self report and clinician‐rated scales (PHQ‐15, CGI ‐ Improvement Scale) · somatoform disorders in adults
Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults (2014) · Cochrane
RR 2 [0.9, 4.43]2 studies · 163 participantsVery low
New‐generation antidepressants vs placebo
Functional disability and quality of life (post‐treatment score on self report scales) Different self report scales (SF‐36, SDS) · somatoform disorders in adults
Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 163 participantsVery low
Natural products vs placebo
Severity/intensity of MUPS (post‐treatment score on self report scales) Different self report scales (SOMS‐7, SCL‐90‐R Somatisation Subscore) · somatoform disorders in adults
Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 322 participantsLow
Natural products vs placebo
Acceptability (all‐cause drop‐outs4) · somatoform disorders in adults
Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.85 [0.4, 1.78]3 studies · 506 participantsLow
Natural products vs placebo
Anxiety (post‐treatment score on self report and clinician‐rated scales) Different self report and clinician‐rated scales (HARS, VAS) · somatoform disorders in adults
Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 321 participantsLow
Natural products vs placebo
Depression (post‐treatment score on self report and clinician‐rated scales) Different self report and clinician‐rated scales (HDRS, BDI) · somatoform disorders in adults
Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 321 participantsLow
Natural products vs placebo
Adverse effects (drop‐outs due to adverse effects4) · somatoform disorders in adults
Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.54 [0.08, 3.5]3 studies · 506 participantsLow
Tricyclic antidepressants vs placebo
Acceptability (all‐cause drop‐outs) · somatoform disorders in adults
Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Natural products vs placebo
Treatment response (post‐treatment score on self report and clinician‐rated scales) Different self report and clinician‐rated scales (PHQ‐15, CGI ‐ Improvement Scale) · somatoform disorders in adults
Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.77 [1.34, 2.34]2 studies · 324 participantsVery low
Natural products vs placebo
Functional disability and quality of life (post‐treatment score on self report scales) · somatoform disorders in adults
Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Tricyclic antidepressants vs another medication
Severity/intensity of MUPS (post‐treatment score on self report scales) Different self report scales (VAS‐Pain, SCL‐90‐R Somatisation Subscore) · somatoform disorders in adults
Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 177 participantsLow