Surgical debridement via an endoscopic method vs conventional 'open' surgical debridement
- no estimate extracted1 study · 106 participantsVery low
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether early changes overall morbidity Median compared with delayed open or laparoscopic appendicectomy (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether early changes wound infection Median compared with delayed open or laparoscopic appendicectomy (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether early changes abdominal abscess Median compared with delayed open or laparoscopic appendicectomy (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether early changes faecal fistula Median compared with delayed open or laparoscopic appendicectomy (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether early changes total length of hospital stay (days) compared with delayed open or laparoscopic appendicectomy (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether early changes time away from normal activities (days) Median compared with delayed open or laparoscopic appendicectomy (very low certainty).
Summary of findings table ‐ Recombinant activated factor VII showed no clear difference in death or dependence (mRS 4–6) compared with placebo/open control (low certainty).
Summary of findings table ‐ Antifibrinolytic drug(s) showed no clear difference in all serious adverse events compared with placebo/open control (high certainty).
Summary of findings table ‐ Antifibrinolytic drug(s) showed no clear difference in death from any cause compared with placebo/open control (high certainty).
Summary of findings table ‐ Platelet transfusion probably leads to higher death or dependence (mRS 4–6) compared with open control (moderate certainty).