Participants cured or improved · Adults with overactive bladder (OAB)
1 finding from 1 review
Participants cured or improved · Adults with overactive bladder (OAB)
Electrical stimulation probably leads to higher participants cured or improved compared with placebo or sham treatment (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Participants with improvement in urgency urinary incontinence · Adults with overactive bladder (OAB)
1 finding from 1 review
OAB‐related quality of life · Adults with overactive bladder (OAB)
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse effects · Adults with overactive bladder (OAB)
1 finding from 1 review
Participants with improvement in urgency urinary incontinence · Adults with overactive bladder (OAB)
Electrical stimulation showed no clear difference in participants with improvement in urgency urinary incontinence compared with placebo or sham treatment (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OAB‐related quality of life · Adults with overactive bladder (OAB)
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse effects · Adults with overactive bladder (OAB)
Electrical stimulation showed no clear difference in adverse effects compared with placebo or sham treatment (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Participants cured or improved · Adults with overactive bladder (OAB)
Electrical stimulation probably leads to higher participants cured or improved compared with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Function · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Chronic neck pain Short‐term · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain
Manipulation (thoracic) showed no clear difference in chronic neck pain Short‐term compared with inactive control (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
QoL · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Pain · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Acute and subacute neck pain Short‐term · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain
Manipulation (thoracic) showed no clear difference in acute and subacute neck pain Short‐term compared with inactive control (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Chronic neck pain Intermediate‐term · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain
Manipulation (thoracic) showed no clear difference in chronic neck pain Intermediate‐term compared with inactive control (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of eyes with uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better post‐treatment. ‐ 12 months · patients with myopia
Laser‐assisted in‐situ keratomileusis (LASIK) may leads to higher UCVA of 20/20 or better compared with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Eyes within ± 0.5 D of target refraction · patients with myopia
Laser‐assisted in‐situ keratomileusis (LASIK) showed no clear difference in within 0.50 D of target refraction compared with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Postoperative spherical equivalent · patients with myopia
1 finding from 1 review
Lost one or more lines of BCVA · patients with myopia
Laser‐assisted in‐situ keratomileusis (LASIK) showed no clear difference in lost one or more lines of BCVA compared with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Final BCVA of 20/40 or less · patients with myopia
It is very uncertain whether laser‐assisted in‐situ keratomileusis (LASIK) changes final BCVA of 20/40 or less compared with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review